2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective composite membranes of cellulose acetate for removal of benzophenone-3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two major limitations observed in this study were a decline in the filtration capacity due to fouling and quick fouling in the MF membrane, thus reducing the removal efficiency from 37% to 24%. Interestingly, a higher removal efficiency of 97% was reported by Al-Rifai et al [ 122 ] when MF and RO were combined in treating EDCs. Yet, BPA at a concentration of 500 ng/L was discovered in the effluent after the treatment process and a higher energy demand was required.…”
Section: Contemporary Techniques For the Removal Of Edcs From Various Water Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The two major limitations observed in this study were a decline in the filtration capacity due to fouling and quick fouling in the MF membrane, thus reducing the removal efficiency from 37% to 24%. Interestingly, a higher removal efficiency of 97% was reported by Al-Rifai et al [ 122 ] when MF and RO were combined in treating EDCs. Yet, BPA at a concentration of 500 ng/L was discovered in the effluent after the treatment process and a higher energy demand was required.…”
Section: Contemporary Techniques For the Removal Of Edcs From Various Water Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This enormous interest by researchers has triggered several studies utilizing nanomaterials, such as zeolite-zinc oxide, poly-4vinylpyride b-ethylene oxide, mono-porphyrin, polyamide nanotubes, carbon nanotube (CNT), polypropylene, MnO 2 , nanofibrous, TiO 2 , PA/TiO 2 , and AgBiO 3 , via incorporation in the membrane matrix, as seen in Table 3 , to improve the properties of the membranes and increase the rejection rate of EDCs contaminants [ 21 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 ]. Findings from their studies have reported significant improvement in the membrane properties, including excellent hydrophilicity, higher flux, improved membrane strength, wettability, stability, enhanced mechanical properties, better reusability, and upturn rejection of EDCs contaminants (˃99%).…”
Section: Rejection Of Edcs By Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from their studies have reported significant improvement in the membrane properties, including excellent hydrophilicity, higher flux, improved membrane strength, wettability, stability, enhanced mechanical properties, better reusability, and upturn rejection of EDCs contaminants (˃99%). Notably, significant removal (˃98%) of BPA and other compounds was recorded when nanomaterials were incorporated in the membrane matrix in various studies [ 275 , 276 , 277 , 278 ], as indicated in Table 4 . In the same vein, Alvarez et al [ 279 ], in their review, reported that some distinctive properties of nanomaterials (such as high hydrophilicity, reactivity, and small size) could be explored to mitigate membrane fouling.…”
Section: Rejection Of Edcs By Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymeric membranes are widely used for water treatment, e.g., waste streams from agro-food [ 1 ], textile [ 2 ], and petroleum industries [ 3 ], or removal of pollutants from drinking water [ 4 ], enabling the concentrate to be treated or discharged and, thereby, reducing the contaminants directly or indirectly discharged into wastewater [ 1 , 5 , 6 ]. Pressure-driven membrane processes such as Microfiltration (MF), Ultrafiltration (UF), Nanofiltration (NF) and Reverse Osmosis (RO) are considered as promising alternatives for the removal of large amounts of organic micropollutants; however, NF and RO are the processes proven to be very effective filtration technologies in withdrawing micropollutants [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%