2004
DOI: 10.1086/421908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Collision Strengths for Fine‐Structure Transitions in S i

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S i S i is a new addition to the database. We have included effective collision strengths from Tayal (2004). gf and E1 A-values have been obtained from Zatsarinny & Bartschat (2006).…”
Section: S-like Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S i S i is a new addition to the database. We have included effective collision strengths from Tayal (2004). gf and E1 A-values have been obtained from Zatsarinny & Bartschat (2006).…”
Section: S-like Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the electron density, n e , is expected to be much lower than for hydrogen, n H , it has larger collisional de-excitation rates. Electron collision rates are available for S I from Tayal (2004) and Fe II from Bautista et al (2015, and Priv Comm), S+H collision rates can be estimated using the O+H rates of Lique et al (2018), and Fe+H rates are given by Hollenbach & McKee (1989). Using the thermodynamic models of Rodgers & Glassgold (1991), Harper et al (2001), or Harper et al (2017b) (where the gas temperatures are reduced close to the star) both lines are formed predominantly above the critical densities (i.e., thermalized) when T gas > 500 K. If Fe II and S I and are dominant ionization states, then the ratio of [Fe II] 25.99 µm and [S I] 25.25 µm fluxes, would be ≤ 4.5 in the optically thin limit, and lower, ∼ 1.5, when allowing for optical depth effects.…”
Section: [Fementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use CHIANTI version 8 to predict the S I emissivities. Notably, Table 3 of Tayal (2004) mislabels the collision strengths from levels 1 and 3 to levels 4 and 5, and we have corrected the corresponding data file. We find an S:Ca abundance ratio of 29±7.…”
Section: Chemical Abundancesmentioning
confidence: 99%