1996
DOI: 10.1006/adnd.1996.0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Collision Strengths for Electron Impact Excitation of Singly Ionized Sulfur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that new R-matrix calculations have recently been carried out for S II by Ramsbottom et al (1996), including 43 fine-structure levels, up to the n = 4 configurations. These will be assessed in the next release of CHIANTI.…”
Section: S IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that new R-matrix calculations have recently been carried out for S II by Ramsbottom et al (1996), including 43 fine-structure levels, up to the n = 4 configurations. These will be assessed in the next release of CHIANTI.…”
Section: S IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5.1), we consider 10 Taking into account the lack of O 2+ in the nebula and the similarity between ionization potentials of O + (35.12 eV) and S 2+ (34.83 eV), this seems to be a reasonable conclusion. 11 The atomic dataset used by these authors was the following: collision strengths by Ramsbottom et al (1996) for S + and Tayal & Gupta (1999) for S 2+ . Transition probabilities by Keenan et al (1993) for S + and Mendoza & Zeippen (1982) and Kaufman & Sugar (1986) for S 2+ .…”
Section: Sulphurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a picture tells more than one thousand words, there is no better answer to such question than a plot describing a real science case. (Podobedova et al (2009);Ramsbottom et al (1996);Tayal & Zatsarinny (2010)). It can easily be seen that the results depend strongly on the data used: for example, the peak density changes by up to a factor of 3 (from ≈ 5000 cm −3 to ≈ 15000 cm −3 ), while the peak temperature changes by ≈ 5000 K.…”
Section: Do Uncertainties Matter?mentioning
confidence: 99%