Effective cleaning of endoscopic lenses to achieve visual clarity for minimally invasive abdominopelvic surgery: a systematic review

Abstract

Objective To review the recently available interventions to achieve optimal visual clarity in laparoscopic abdominopelvic surgery compared to conventional cleaning alternatives. Summary background data Currently, there is no consensus on the most effective method for the cleaning of endoscopic lenses used in minimally invasive abdominopelvic surgery. Methods Literature searching for articles relevant to answering a predefined research question was performed in December 2019 and involved searching of the electronic databases of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Registry, and EMBASE. Basic search terms were derived using the PICO (population, intervention, comparator and outcomes) framework and through a scoping search of literature via MEDLINE. A manual search of Google Scholar and citation screening of eligible studies was also performed to ensure the identification and inclusion of all pertinent studies to address the research question. Results Among conventional and readily available methods, the most effective approaches involved heated sterile water, heating of laparoscope lenses, and surfactant solutions, including FRED and Ultra-Stop, while evaluations of all novel devices and methods were more effective than controls, which included lens wiping systems and air and carbon dioxide flow systems. While the former surgical techniques were consistently associated with superior lens cleaning ability and/or defogging capability and subsequent optical clarity of images within the surgical field, no methods conferred any meaningful effects upon other clinically important outcomes, such as operative time, costs, complication rates and length of stay, suggesting that decision making concerning the selection of lens cleaning method/device should suit the preferences of the instrument operator and/or the responsible surgeon. Conclusions We demonstrated that a range of endoscopic lens cleaning methods and devices can be used to achieve sufficient optical clarity of the laparoscopic surgical field through either preventing lenses from fogging and/or facilitating the inter-operative cleaning of fouled lenses. Despite the various methods evaluated in this review, there were no significant differences in complication rates between the intervention and control groups.

Impaired robotic surgical visualization: archaic issues in a modern operating room

“…There appears to be limited research focusing on the consequences of lens occlusions and poor visualization in the RAS [13,14] Nezhat's et al found that maintenance of visual clarity is more di cult for RAS because the system occasionally switches between the 30 degree and 0 degree camera, both of which are also bulkier than the laparoscopic camera [7]. FloShield™ (Minimally Invasive Devices, Inc.) introduced a cleaner speci cally designed for the robotic scope.…”

“…FloShield™ (Minimally Invasive Devices, Inc.) introduced a cleaner speci cally designed for the robotic scope. Moreover, Insu ow™ (Lexion Medical) has tested their device in some RAS cases [5,7] However, such solutions have shown limited clinical impact and more research needs to be conducted to understand and quantify how visual occlusions play a role in the outcome of an RAS procedure [14]. In order to shed a light on the degree of surgical disruption, this study quanti es the degree of disruption due to visual acuity in RAS at a major academic institution.…”