2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.05.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective biosecurity to protect North American studs and clients from emerging infectious disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our results identified distance to the main road as associated with increased chances for PRRSV circulation. This has led concern by the swine industry (Reicks, 2019), since vehicle movement has demonstrated to have a significant impact on increasing the transmission of several other diseases, for example, African Swine Fever (ASF) (Mur, Martínez‐López, & Sánchez‐Vizcaíno, 2012), Classical Swine Fever (CSF) (Bronsvoort et al., 2008) and for Foot‐and‐Mouth Disease (Muroga et al., 2013). Our findings indicate that farms located at 0.5–0.7 km from major roads were more easily exposed to PRRSV; therefore, this distance could be used to make decisions about routes used for pig movement, the enhancement of on‐farm biosecurity of sites within this range of distances to major roads, and in future expansions of operations new buildings could be built beyond 0.7 km from the main road.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, our results identified distance to the main road as associated with increased chances for PRRSV circulation. This has led concern by the swine industry (Reicks, 2019), since vehicle movement has demonstrated to have a significant impact on increasing the transmission of several other diseases, for example, African Swine Fever (ASF) (Mur, Martínez‐López, & Sánchez‐Vizcaíno, 2012), Classical Swine Fever (CSF) (Bronsvoort et al., 2008) and for Foot‐and‐Mouth Disease (Muroga et al., 2013). Our findings indicate that farms located at 0.5–0.7 km from major roads were more easily exposed to PRRSV; therefore, this distance could be used to make decisions about routes used for pig movement, the enhancement of on‐farm biosecurity of sites within this range of distances to major roads, and in future expansions of operations new buildings could be built beyond 0.7 km from the main road.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, our results identified distance to the main road as associated with increased chances for PRRSV circulation. This has led concern by the swine industry (Reicks, 2019), since vehicle movement has demonstrated to have a significant impact on increasing the transmission of several other diseases, for example, African Swine Fever (ASF) (Mur, Martínez-López, & Sánchez-Vizcaíno, 2012), Classical Swine Fever (CSF) (Bronsvoort et al, 2008) and for Foot-and-Mouth Disease (Muroga et al, 2013).…”
Section: Factors Promoting or Restricting Prrsv Dissemination Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feed, ingredient, and feed mill biosecurity is essential for reducing infectious disease risks at all stages of swine production [ 76 , 77 ], and implementation of biosecurity procedures focused on feed can help address these risks. Breaches in feed biosecurity can result in virus contamination during the growing, harvesting, processing, or post-processing of crops intended for swine feed.…”
Section: Reducing Asfv Risk Through Feed Biosecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semen also plays an important role in the PRRSV epidemic situation in China. 4,7,12 To increase our knowledge about the epidemic prevalence and molecular evolution of NA-PRRSV in pig breeding farms, we collected samples across 4 provinces in China from 2016 to 2018 and screened them by PCR testing with specific primers that could differentiate different groups of NA-PRRSVs. We sequenced complete open reading frame 5 (ORF5) nucleotide sequences and used representative samples for virus isolation on MARC-145 (cloned African green monkey kidney) cells or porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%