Effective axillary malodour reduction by polyquaternium‐16‐containing deodorants

Traupe, B.; Fölster, H.; Max, Heiner; Schulz, Jens

doi:10.1111/ics.12358

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 26 publications

(44 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, a sensory assessment is conducted to evaluate the ability of an antiperspirant product in reducing the offensive body odour [ 54 ]. This assessment involves human volunteers and a panellist of trained sniffers.…”

Section: Research Progress On Antiperspirant Products and Composition...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is because each laboratory can decide when will they going to carry out the sniffing testing, and where will be the site of assessment. For instance, Traupe et al [ 54 ] carried out the assessment 24 and 48 h after application of the deodorant product. Then followed by sniffing directly at the axillary region of the test subject.…”

Section: Research Progress On Antiperspirant Products and Composition...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Deodorants and antiperspirants: New trends in their active agents and testing methods

Teerasumran

Velliou

Bai

et al. 2023

Intern J of Cosmetic Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sweating is the human body's thermoregulation system but also results in unpleasant body odour which can diminish the self‐confidence of people. There has been continued research in finding solutions to reduce both sweating and body odour. Sweating is a result of increased sweat flow and malodour results from certain bacteria and ecological factors such as eating habits. Research on deodorant development focuses on inhibiting the growth of malodour‐forming bacteria using antimicrobial agents, whereas research on antiperspirant synthesis focuses on technologies reducing the sweat flow, which not only reduces body odour but also improves people's appearance. Antiperspirant's technology is based on the use of aluminium salts which can form a gel plug at sweat pores, obstructing the sweat fluid from arising onto the skin surface. In this paper, we perform a systematic review on the recent progress in the development of novel antiperspirant and deodorant active ingredients that are alcohol‐free, paraben‐free, and naturally derived. Several studies have been reported on the alternative class of actives that can potentially be used for antiperspirant and body odour treatment including deodorizing fabric, bacterial, and plant extracts. However, a significant challenge is to understand how the gel‐plugs of antiperspirant actives are formed in sweat pores and how to deliver long‐lasting antiperspirant and deodorant benefits.

show abstract

Section: Research Progress On Antiperspirant Products and Composition...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Research Progress On Antiperspirant Products and Composition...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Deodorants and antiperspirants: New trends in their active agents and testing methods

Teerasumran

Velliou

Bai

et al. 2023

Intern J of Cosmetic Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…5 Current treatments for AO include antiperspirants, deodorants, botulinum toxin injections, subcutaneous laser treatments, percutaneous ethanol injections, and various types of surgery. [7][8][9][10][11][12] To permanently resolve AO, apocrine glands must be eradicated through surgery. 4,13,14 However, various surgical complications have been reported such as hematoma, seroma, skin necrosis, scarring, and a prolonged recovery period.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Long-Term Use of Antiperspirant is Associated with a Low Risk of Postoperative Complications in Patients with Axillary Osmidrosis

Ho¹,

Yang²,

Tsai³

2022

CCID

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Many patients with axillary osmidrosis (AO) cannot tolerate the local irritation of strong antiperspirants and discontinue AO use within a short time. This study evaluates the effect of long-term antiperspirant use on postoperative complications after osmidrosis surgery. Patients and Methods A total of 116 females (66 antiperspirant and 50 non-antiperspirant cases) who underwent osmidrosis surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. Results Patients with long-term antiperspirant use had a lower risk of full-thickness skin necrosis compared with those who did not use antiperspirants (odds ratio [OR] = 0.048, 95% confidence Interval [CI]: 0.006–0.392, p = 0.005). Patients with antiperspirants use also had a lower risk of moderate-to-severe erythema compared to those without antiperspirants use (moderate vs mild erythema: OR = 0.351, 95% CI: 0.129–0.959, p = 0.041; severe vs mild erythema: OR = 0.161, 95% CI: 0.047–0.550, p = 0.004). Patients who used antiperspirants also had a lower risk of severe skin erosion compared to those who did not use antiperspirants (severe vs mild skin erosion: OR = 0.164, 95% CI: 0.037–0.725, p = 0.017). There was a trend of lower risk in moderate skin erosion in patients with antiperspirant use compared to those without antiperspirant use, but it was not statistically significant (moderate vs mild epidermal damage and peeling: OR = 0.406, 95% CI: 0.158–1.043, p = 0.061). Conclusion Postoperative complications in patients with AO who undergo osmidrosis surgery are lower in those with a long-term antiperspirant use compared to patients who did not use antiperspirants.

show abstract

“…To control cosmetic conditions the use of personal care products has become common place. These products attempt to alleviate symptoms through the use of ingredients including skin moisturisers and topical antimicrobials [ 20 , 21 ]. However, despite the use of these products, in the absence of disease flares, variations in seasons, environmental conditions or perturbations in the structure or integrity of the skin barrier, the temporal stability of the skin microbiome has been shown to be robust [ 22 , 23 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In-vivo impact of common cosmetic preservative systems in full formulation on the skin microbiome

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Preservatives play an essentially role in ensuring that cosmetic formulations remain safe for use via control of microbial contamination. Commonly used preservatives include organic acids, alcohols and phenols and these play an essential role in controlling the growth of bacteria, fungi and moulds in substrates that can potentially act as a rich food source for microbial contaminants. Whilst the activity of these compounds is clear, both in vitro and in formulation, little information exists on the potential impact that common preservative systems, in full formulation, have on the skin’s resident microbiome. Dysbiosis of the skin’s microbiome has been associated with a number of cosmetic conditions but there currently are no in vivo studies investigating the potential for preservative ingredients, when included in personal care formulations under normal use conditions, to impact the cutaneous microbiome. Here we present an analysis of four in vivo studies that examine the impact of different preservation systems in full formulation, in different products formats, with varying durations of application. This work demonstrates that despite the antimicrobial efficacy of the preservatives in vitro, the skin microbiome is not impacted by preservative containing products in vivo.

show abstract

Effective axillary malodour reduction by polyquaternium‐16‐containing deodorants

Cited by 8 publications

References 26 publications

Deodorants and antiperspirants: New trends in their active agents and testing methods

Deodorants and antiperspirants: New trends in their active agents and testing methods

Long-Term Use of Antiperspirant is Associated with a Low Risk of Postoperative Complications in Patients with Axillary Osmidrosis

In-vivo impact of common cosmetic preservative systems in full formulation on the skin microbiome

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About