2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.08.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective asymptotic regularity for one-parameter nonexpansive semigroups

Abstract: We give explicit bounds on the computation of approximate common fixed points of one-parameter strongly continuous semigroups of nonexpansive mappings on a subset C of a general Banach space. Moreover, we provide the first explicit and highly uniform rate of convergence for an iterative procedure to compute such points for convex C. Our results are obtained by a logical analysis of the proof (proof mining) of a theorem by T. Suzuki.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper we obtain effective, quantitative results on the approximate common fixed points of a one-parameter nonexpansive semigroup {T(t) : t ≥ 0} on a subset C of a Banach space X by logical analysis of the proof of a result by Suzuki in [20]. It is very interesting that the bound obtained here (Section 3) is completely different to the bound obtained in another recent work [13] by Kohlenbach and the author. The latter had been derived by proof mining on a proof of a statement again by Suzuki in [21] concerning, again, the common fixed points of {T(t) : t ≥ 0} that is a generalization of the corresponding statement in [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper we obtain effective, quantitative results on the approximate common fixed points of a one-parameter nonexpansive semigroup {T(t) : t ≥ 0} on a subset C of a Banach space X by logical analysis of the proof of a result by Suzuki in [20]. It is very interesting that the bound obtained here (Section 3) is completely different to the bound obtained in another recent work [13] by Kohlenbach and the author. The latter had been derived by proof mining on a proof of a statement again by Suzuki in [21] concerning, again, the common fixed points of {T(t) : t ≥ 0} that is a generalization of the corresponding statement in [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The latter had been derived by proof mining on a proof of a statement again by Suzuki in [21] concerning, again, the common fixed points of {T(t) : t ≥ 0} that is a generalization of the corresponding statement in [20]. We briefly discuss a comparison between the bound in [13] and the one obtained in this work. In Section 3 we will also present an adaptation of a general logical metatheorem by Gerhardy and Kohlenbach for the specific mathematical framework and the assumptions by Suzuki, in order to illustrate how the metatheorem guarantees the extractability of the bound in the situation at hand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…for all M, b ∈ N, p ∈ C, ε > 0p ≤ b ∧ S(p) − p ≤ Φ(ε, M, b) → ∀t ∈ [0, M ] ( T (t)p − p ≤ ε).The main noneffective tool used in Suzuki's proof is the binary König's lemma WKL and by Remark 2.4 it is guaranteed to have a primitive recursive (in the sense of Kleene) bound Φ. In fact, the bound actually extracted in[42] is of rather low complexity:Φ(2 −m , M, b) D2 ω D,b (3+[log 2 (1+M N )]+m)+1 , φ(k, f ) := max{2f (i) + 6 : 0 < i ≤ k}. Example: α = √ 2, β = 2, λ = 1/2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%