Effective Arterial Elastance Is Insensitive to Pulsatile Arterial Load

Abstract

Abstract-Effective arterial elastance (E A ) was proposed as a lumped parameter that incorporates pulsatile and resistive afterload and is increasingly being used in clinical studies. Theoretical modeling studies suggest that E A is minimally affected by pulsatile load, but little human data are available. We assessed the relationship between E A and arterial load determined noninvasively from central pressure-flow analyses among middle-aged adults in the general population (n=2367) and a diverse clinical population of older adults (n=193). In a separate study, we investigated the sensitivity of E A to changes in pulsatile load induced by isometric exercise (n=73). The combination of systemic vascular resistance and heart rate predicted 95.6% and 97.8% of the variability in E A among middle-aged and older adults, respectively. E A demonstrated a quasi-perfect linear relationship with the ratio of systemic vascular resistance/heart period (middle-aged adults, R=0.972; older adults, R=0.99; P<0.0001). Aortic characteristic impedance, total arterial compliance, reflection magnitude, and timing accounted together for <1% of the variability in E A in either middle-aged or older adults. Despite pronounced changes in pulsatile load induced by isometric exercise, changes in E A were not independently associated with changes pulsatile load but were rather a nearly perfect linear function of the ratio of systemic vascular resistance/ heart period (R=0.99; P<0.0001). Our findings demonstrate that E A is simply a function of systemic vascular resistance and heart rate and is negligibly influenced by (and insensitive to) changes in pulsatile afterload in humans. Its current interpretation as a lumped parameter of pulsatile and resistive afterload should thus be reassessed.

Misinterpretation of the Determinants of Elevated Forward Wave Amplitude Inflates the Role of the Proximal Aorta

“…Ascending aortic flow was measured with phase‐contrast MRI, as previously described 31. To avoid errors introduced by phase offset and eddy currents, we scaled the flow time integral to measured stroke volume by segmentation of steady‐state free precession (SSFP) images.…”

Recommendations for Improving and Standardizing Vascular Research on Arterial Stiffness

“…4.3 Effective arterial elastance (Ea) should not be used as an index of pulsatile LV afterload or arterial stiffness, since it represents a poor index of pulsatile load and is not significantly influenced by arterial stiffness (Class III, Level of Evidence B) (9;10). …”

“…However, Ea is almost entirely determined by the product of heart rate (a cardiac property) and SVR (179;180), and (despite its name) does not reflect or characterize pulsatile LV afterload (9;10). Ea does not represent a physical elastance (or compliance) and is not related to arterial stiffness.…”

Ventricular–Arterial Coupling in Chronic Heart Failure

“…31,33 E A has been shown to be minimally sensitive to (and in some cases to vary inversely with) parameters of pulsatile arterial load. 12,[30][31][32] The poor performance of E A in capturing pulsatile arterial load is readily explained by the many simplifying assumptions made during its derivation, 12,31,32 which are untenable in the presence of prominent wave reflections.…”