2005
DOI: 10.1080/02796015.2005.12086279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect Sizes in Single Case Research: How Large is Large?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a compliment to visual analysis, effect sizes were calculated to assess standardized mean differences between baseline and intervention phases (Parker et al, 2005). This is an appropriate statistical analysis for multiple baseline design because effect size is not influenced by sample size in this case and provides an index of strength of association between intervention and outcome (Parker et al, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a compliment to visual analysis, effect sizes were calculated to assess standardized mean differences between baseline and intervention phases (Parker et al, 2005). This is an appropriate statistical analysis for multiple baseline design because effect size is not influenced by sample size in this case and provides an index of strength of association between intervention and outcome (Parker et al, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous single-case effect size indices of varying complexity, flexibility, and practical accessibility (J. M. Campbell, 2004; Gorman & Allison, 1996; Kratochwill & Levin, 1992; Parker et al, 2005; Shadish, 2014). Few methods account for baseline trend, particularly among the nonparametric effect size statistics that lack the distributional assumptions which limit regression-based methods (Parker, Vannest, & Davis, 2011).…”
Section: Plan For Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 20 studies, only seven examined the effect of SWPBIs on ODR, and the mean effect size for those studies was .35 using a regression-based single-case design effect size ( r 2 ). Preliminary guidelines for interpreting this single-case design effect size (Parker et al, 2005) suggests that the independent variable (i.e., SWPBIS) explained approximately 35% of the variance in ODR and is considered a small effect. However, a number of significant methodological limitations limit generalization of findings.…”
Section: Schoolwide Positive Behavior Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%