1989
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
1,379
1
57

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,175 publications
(1,468 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
13
1,379
1
57
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences between groups at any given point in time were investigated using a t-test for independent samples. The significance of changes in neuropsychological variables was also assessed by the calculation of the effect sizes [26]. An effect size of 0.2 is considered small, 0.5 medium and 0.8 large [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between groups at any given point in time were investigated using a t-test for independent samples. The significance of changes in neuropsychological variables was also assessed by the calculation of the effect sizes [26]. An effect size of 0.2 is considered small, 0.5 medium and 0.8 large [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 As to the first method, a Friedman test was used to detect significant changes in consecutive VLT, GRT, FIM and QIF scores across the three measurements between the onset of rehabilitation and discharge with the level of significance set at a ¼ 0.05. A Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test was used to identify which intervals were significantly different.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to the second and the third method, the standardized response mean (SRM), which is the mean change score divided by the standard deviation (SD) of the change score, 19,28 and the ES, which is the mean change score divided by the SD of the baseline score, 29,30 have been used. In the present study, we refer to 'delta values' as the mean change scores.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, effect sizes are commonly employed (other methods include using paired t-test comparisons or the responsiveness statistic 8 ), which is a method of calculating the magnitude of change measured by an instrument in a standardized way which allows direct comparisons to be made between different instruments and scales. 13 Table 1 lists details of any instruments identified as being widely used for the assessment of function or mobility in the context of SCI which had received any form of psychometric evaluation in that context, together with brief details of published studies contributing to that evidence.…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%