1933
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1933.00830060064008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect on Stereopsis Produced by Disparate Retinal Images of Different Luminosities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1935
1935
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the deviations from a simple average position are caused by the output of the rivalry pathway, then the manipulations of that pathway should have predictable effects on seen position of stereoscopic contours. Verhoeff (1933) found that changing brightness did alter the perceived binocular position, but the experiment should be repeated in light of newer data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the deviations from a simple average position are caused by the output of the rivalry pathway, then the manipulations of that pathway should have predictable effects on seen position of stereoscopic contours. Verhoeff (1933) found that changing brightness did alter the perceived binocular position, but the experiment should be repeated in light of newer data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, it is an oversimplification to think that a stereopsis mechanism simply adds depth to one of the monocular images. Under some circumstances, in particular when binocular disparities are small, a contour will be seen in neither monocular location, but in an intermediate locus (e.g., Helmholtz, 1909Helmholtz, /1924Hering, 1920Hering, /1964Sheedy& Fry, 1979;Verhoeff, 1933; though see Kaufman &Arditi, 1976, for a contrary view). Even when it assumes this intermediate state, the final binocular percept is not a strict or constant average of the two monocular views.…”
Section: Stereopsis Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of previous experiments on binocular visual direction (Barbeito & Simpson, 1991; Charnwood, 1949; Francis & Harwood, 1951; Hariharan-Vilipuru & Bedell, 2008; Mansfield & Legge, 1996; Ono & Weber, 1981; Verhoeff, 1933) assumed that the relative weighting of eye-position and retinal information from the two eyes is similar in the same subjects. The results of our experiments show that the contributions of the two eyes to eye-position and retinal information do vary similarly between the two eyes in most subjects.…”
Section: Comparison Of Relative Contributions Of Eye-position and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies showed either qualitatively (Charnwood, 1949) or quantitatively (Ding & Sperling, 2006, 2007; Francis & Harwood, 1951; Mansfield & Legge, 1996; Sheedy & Fry, 1979) that the retinal information from the two eyes contributes to perceived OVD. The results of these studies indicate that when the images in the two eyes differ in terms of luminance (Charnwood, 1949; Francis & Harwood, 1951; Verhoeff, 1933), contrast (Ding & Sperling, 2006, 2007; Mansfield & Legge, 1996), or blur (Charnwood, 1949), then the perceived OVD shifts towards the image with the higher luminance or contrast, or lesser blur, implying a differential weighting of the retinal information from the two eyes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has also been shown that decreasing the mean luminance in one eye can also affect binocular functions, e.g. stereo-acuity111, dichoptic contrast detection121314, binocular space perception15, binocular rivalry16, binocular visual evoked potential1718, and binocular sensory dominance19. These results indicate that an interocular luminance difference can induce a functional imbalance between the two eyes in normal observers, reducing binocular function, altering interocular interactions and shifting sensory dominance to the eye with the higher luminance level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%