2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of β grain growth on variant selection and texture memory effect during α→β→α phase transformation in Ti–6 Al–4 V

Abstract: This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues.Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited.In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their pers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The texture of both the steels depended on the fraction of the austenite phase present in them during the intercritical annealing. During the α → γ → α transformation, a texture with a strong {111} component develops by intercritical annealing with the transformation of a certain amount of the γ phase [33][34][35]. Therefore, in the case of the alloy B steel specimens, γ-fibers, which become parallel to the ND during the α→ γ → α transformation because of the incomplete normalization, were not formed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The texture of both the steels depended on the fraction of the austenite phase present in them during the intercritical annealing. During the α → γ → α transformation, a texture with a strong {111} component develops by intercritical annealing with the transformation of a certain amount of the γ phase [33][34][35]. Therefore, in the case of the alloy B steel specimens, γ-fibers, which become parallel to the ND during the α→ γ → α transformation because of the incomplete normalization, were not formed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that the texture changes based on the fraction of austenite phase during intercritical annealing of the two steel types. The texture with a strong {111} component develops by intercritical annealing with a certain amount of γ phase transformed during the α → γ → α transformation [29][30][31]. Therefore, the Alloy B steels with a high phase-transformation temperature did not develop γ-fibers which are components that become parallel to the ND direction as a result of incomplete normalization during the α→ γ → α transformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the β phase, the microstructure evolution of α-phase plays a more crucial role in the process of thermomechanical treatment. After hot deformation and heat treatment, α phase precipitates in the β matrix according to Burgers orientation and grow in a certain direction [25], as shown in Figure 4b,d,f,h. Due to the introduction of a large number of uniform distributed crystal defects, the distribution of α phase in the β matrix is staggered in different directions.…”
Section: Microstructure Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%