2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-018-6229-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of zero bias, 2.7 MeV proton irradiation on HfO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This degradation is because of the change in silicon dioxide's chemical and physical features as well as the passivation of dangling bonds. The generation of trap centres is also possibly responsible for feature differences [50]. However, when the radiation-induced Nss is examined (at about 3x10 12 eV -1 cm -2 ), it can be seen that its level is not very high for pinning the fermi energy level [50] under the maximum cumulative dose of gamma-irradiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This degradation is because of the change in silicon dioxide's chemical and physical features as well as the passivation of dangling bonds. The generation of trap centres is also possibly responsible for feature differences [50]. However, when the radiation-induced Nss is examined (at about 3x10 12 eV -1 cm -2 ), it can be seen that its level is not very high for pinning the fermi energy level [50] under the maximum cumulative dose of gamma-irradiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The generation of trap centres is also possibly responsible for feature differences [50]. However, when the radiation-induced Nss is examined (at about 3x10 12 eV -1 cm -2 ), it can be seen that its level is not very high for pinning the fermi energy level [50] under the maximum cumulative dose of gamma-irradiation. The level of the Rs is also deficient, and it changes less than 2 Ω (from 8.74 to 6.82 Ω) for the maximum radiation doses (10 kGy).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%