1994
DOI: 10.2307/3809685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of White-Tailed Deer on Songbirds within Managed Forests in Pennsylvania

Abstract: White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations have been maintained at high densities in Pennsylvania for several decades with unknown effects on songbirds and their habitats. I evaluated effects of white-tailed deer density on songbird species richness, abundance, and habitat. I simulated 4 deer densities (3.7, 7.9, 14.9, and 24.9 deer/km2) within individually fenced enclosures on 4 65-ha forest areas in northwestern Pennsylvania. Within all enclosures, 10% of the area was clear-cut and 30% was thinne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the young age of these stands at that time (10-11 yr) this trend was attributed mainly to physical structure of vegetation, specifically reduction in stem density and cover at high deer density. Ungulate effects on birds reported throughout the literature are mainly in species of the shrub and ground layers where ungulate browsing is active (deCalesta 1994, McShea and Rappole 2000, Stockton et al 2005. In contrast, ca.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the young age of these stands at that time (10-11 yr) this trend was attributed mainly to physical structure of vegetation, specifically reduction in stem density and cover at high deer density. Ungulate effects on birds reported throughout the literature are mainly in species of the shrub and ground layers where ungulate browsing is active (deCalesta 1994, McShea and Rappole 2000, Stockton et al 2005. In contrast, ca.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from studies on effects of ungulates on insects and their predators have varied and so far few of these has specifically addressed long-term effects of deer-induced changes in vegetation composition (Côte et al 2004, but see Baines et al 1994). While negative effects of deer browsing on birds, especially species that utilize ground and shrub layers, are well documented (deCalesta 1994, McShea and Rappole 2000, Stockton et al 2005, we are aware of no study that has investigated the long-term impacts of browsing-induced changes in vegetation composition on canopy structure or on higher trophic levels in areas established under different known levels of ungulate browsing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For resource managers, impacts from ungulates on vegetation are becoming a common management problem [105][106][107][108][109], while options for controlling ungulate populations by slaughter, translocation and reproductive control receive little public and/or government support [110]. Translocation receives the greatest level of public support, but disease concerns have reduced the safety of translocating wildlife [111][112][113][114].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pennsylvania forests have suffered the impact of overabundant deer since the late 1920s (Hough 1965, Redding 1995, and NERS scientists have completed extensive research documenting deer impact on regeneration processes in Allegheny hardwood forests (deCalesta 1994, Horsley and others 2003, Marquis 1981, Marquis and Brenneman 1981, Tilghman 1989. SILVAH incorporates these research results in the form of a deer impact index, with values ranging from 1, for very low, to 5 for very high .…”
Section: The Workhopmentioning
confidence: 99%