1978
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-68-1343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Wheat Host Cultivars on Pycnidiospore Production by Septoria tritici

Abstract: Mention of a trademark or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, and does not imply approval to the exclusion of other products that also may be suitable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic reproductive number ( R 0 ) is the theoretical number of infections arising from a single infection event and can be useful in predicting the potential development of plant disease epidemics (van den Bosch et al ., ). Pycnidia represent the asexual reproductive output of a Z. tritici strain, with larger pycnidia correlated with a greater number of conidia in earlier work (Gough, ). It has been postulated previously that the number and size of pycnidia could be important measures of virulence in Z. tritici (Stewart and McDonald ; Suffert et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The basic reproductive number ( R 0 ) is the theoretical number of infections arising from a single infection event and can be useful in predicting the potential development of plant disease epidemics (van den Bosch et al ., ). Pycnidia represent the asexual reproductive output of a Z. tritici strain, with larger pycnidia correlated with a greater number of conidia in earlier work (Gough, ). It has been postulated previously that the number and size of pycnidia could be important measures of virulence in Z. tritici (Stewart and McDonald ; Suffert et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Variables characterizing the dynamics of the different processes (such as spore production or lesion development) were seldom assessed, in contrast to studies on biotrophic pathogens such as wheat rusts (Shaner, 1983;Robert et al, 2004). The assessment of the pycnidial density (number of pycnidia cm À2 ; Eyal & Brown, 1976;Simon & Cordo, 1997;Leyva-Mir et al, 2009) and of the spore production (number of pycnidiospores produced by a single pycnidium; Eyal, 1971;Gough, 1978;Jeger et al, 1984) was in limited use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most of the methods were based on an estimation of infected plant tissue, assessments of mycelial (HARROWER 1977) or spore (GOUGH 1978) production have also been used. The most commonly used evaluation method in the field involves estimating the degree of severity on a plot-basis on a 0-9 scale (SAARI and PRESCOTT 1975) with a score of 5 corresponding to the upward disease progress at the mid-point of the plant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%