2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of wheat bran on the health and performance of weaned pigs challenged with Escherichia coli K88+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
30
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion of wheat by-products, such as wheat bran, rich in insoluble NSP, resistant to fermentation, can reduce bowel transit time [8], which could explain some of the changes found. Actually, wheat bran has been reported to reduce pathogen adhesion [56,57] and to promote the Prevotellaceae family [11,58]. Another non-energetic carbohydrate source that could have promoted changes in particular microbial groups is chicory pulp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of wheat by-products, such as wheat bran, rich in insoluble NSP, resistant to fermentation, can reduce bowel transit time [8], which could explain some of the changes found. Actually, wheat bran has been reported to reduce pathogen adhesion [56,57] and to promote the Prevotellaceae family [11,58]. Another non-energetic carbohydrate source that could have promoted changes in particular microbial groups is chicory pulp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the hard outer layer of wheat grain, the bran (WB), whose main function is to protect the grain against pathogen invasion, could be a natural source of QQ compounds or other antimicrobial substances. Many beneficial effects have been described for WB (Mohsin-Javed et al, 2012), also including anti-adhesive properties against enteropathogens (Molist et al, 2009). In this regard, it has been previously demonstrated that WB extract has the potential to modify the intestinal microbiota of animals (Molist et al, 2009) and also to interfere with the binding capacity of enteropathogens such as Escherichia coli K88 to intestinal epithelial cells and mucus (Hermes et al, 2011;Gonzalez-Ortiz et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many beneficial effects have been described for WB (Mohsin-Javed et al, 2012), also including anti-adhesive properties against enteropathogens (Molist et al, 2009). In this regard, it has been previously demonstrated that WB extract has the potential to modify the intestinal microbiota of animals (Molist et al, 2009) and also to interfere with the binding capacity of enteropathogens such as Escherichia coli K88 to intestinal epithelial cells and mucus (Hermes et al, 2011;Gonzalez-Ortiz et al, 2013). These reported effects could be explained, between other factors, by a possible interference of the WB extract in the E. coli QS systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional investigations showed a reduction of the E. coli population in the ileum digesta, and more interestingly, a reduction of the enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) K88 attached to the ileum mucosa was observed when piglets received WB in their diet [10]. Even though the arabinoxylooligosaccharides of WB were initially considered to promote the anti-adhesive properties against enteropathogens [8], preliminary data suggested the involvement of a proteinaceous compound, which could specifically recognize ETEC K88 [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%