2017
DOI: 10.1515/amm-2017-0184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Wetting Agent and Carbide Volume Fraction on the Wear Response of Aluminum Matrix Composites Reinforced by WC Nanoparticles and Aluminide Particles

Abstract: Aluminum matrix composites were prepared by adding submicron sized WC particles into a melt of Al 1050 under mechanical stirring, with the scope to determine: (a) the most appropriate salt flux amongst KBF 4 , K 2 TiF 6 , K 3 AlF 6 and Na 3 AlF 6 for optimum particle wetting and distribution and (b) the maximum carbide volume fraction (CVF) for optimum response to sliding wear. The nature of the wetting agent notably affected particle incorporation, with K 2 TiF 6 providing the greatest particle insertion. A u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to explain the variety of the morphological features characterizing the microstructure, the works of El‐Mahallawy and Lekatou et al should be addressed. According to these research efforts, a series of potential reactions‐thermal transformations may take place: At0.25em830°normalC:3K2TiF6()s+13Al()l3Al3Ti()s+3KAlF4()l+K3AlF6()l, 19Al()l+3WC3Al5normalW+Al4C3, 16Al()l+3WC3Al4normalW+Al4C3, On0.25emcooling0.25em()697°normalC:Al()l+Al5normalWAl12normalW0.25em()peritectic, On0.25emcooling0.25em()661°normalC:Al()l+Al12normalWAl()s0.25em()peritectic. Figure presents the X‐ray diffractrograms of the 0.5 and 2.0 vol% composite systems (a lower and a higher particle additions) as examples of the various phases formed adopted by a previous work of the same research team, which are met, however, in all the different composites produced in the present effort. Both intermetallic (in situ) and WC carbide (ex situ) reinforcing phases can be recognized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In order to explain the variety of the morphological features characterizing the microstructure, the works of El‐Mahallawy and Lekatou et al should be addressed. According to these research efforts, a series of potential reactions‐thermal transformations may take place: At0.25em830°normalC:3K2TiF6()s+13Al()l3Al3Ti()s+3KAlF4()l+K3AlF6()l, 19Al()l+3WC3Al5normalW+Al4C3, 16Al()l+3WC3Al4normalW+Al4C3, On0.25emcooling0.25em()697°normalC:Al()l+Al5normalWAl12normalW0.25em()peritectic, On0.25emcooling0.25em()661°normalC:Al()l+Al12normalWAl()s0.25em()peritectic. Figure presents the X‐ray diffractrograms of the 0.5 and 2.0 vol% composite systems (a lower and a higher particle additions) as examples of the various phases formed adopted by a previous work of the same research team, which are met, however, in all the different composites produced in the present effort. Both intermetallic (in situ) and WC carbide (ex situ) reinforcing phases can be recognized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to notice the presence of eutectic microconstiutents of Al‐Fe and Al‐Fe‐Si nature located at the Al grain boundaries. Lekatou et al have commented in details on their formation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations