The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1007/bf03266658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Weld Quality and Postweld Improvement Techniques on the Fatigue Resistance of Extra High Strength Steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The square of the correlation coefficient r and standard deviation of logC corresponding to logΝ f are also shown. The reported slopes for ASW tests are usually much shallower than m = 3, for example, m = 3.8-5.9 or higher, [13][14][15] and it has been presented 16 that a slope of m = 5 fits both available HFMI-treated fatigue data and existing data for hammer-peened welds. MSSPD fitting results with m = 5.85 are utilized below because the shallower slope gives better correspondence to the experimental findings, both for ASW and for mechanically treated joints (m = 5 would give C char = 10 18.59 and C mean = 10 19.26 , Fig.…”
Section: A S T E R S -N C U R V E B a S E D O N A S -W E L D E D D mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The square of the correlation coefficient r and standard deviation of logC corresponding to logΝ f are also shown. The reported slopes for ASW tests are usually much shallower than m = 3, for example, m = 3.8-5.9 or higher, [13][14][15] and it has been presented 16 that a slope of m = 5 fits both available HFMI-treated fatigue data and existing data for hammer-peened welds. MSSPD fitting results with m = 5.85 are utilized below because the shallower slope gives better correspondence to the experimental findings, both for ASW and for mechanically treated joints (m = 5 would give C char = 10 18.59 and C mean = 10 19.26 , Fig.…”
Section: A S T E R S -N C U R V E B a S E D O N A S -W E L D E D D mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of statistical analysis, Costa et al reported FAT 50% = 250 MPa and FAT 95% = 154 MPa with m = 5.16. Lieurade et al 7 carried out fatigue tests with the stress ratio R = 0.2 and σ max = constant = σ yield /1.5 on symmetrical MAG welded butt joints in as-welded condition (number of tests 42). Test specimens were fabricated from S700 and S960 steel plates with t equal to 8 mm.…”
Section: Fatigue Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 In this study, new relations for the estimation of the strain-life curve are utilized, Eq. (7). 19 However, the simplification leads to a practical problem because the HB values measured on the test specimen have some variation over the weld toe volume where the crack may initiate.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Materials Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the efficiency of these processes seems to be lower than hammer and ultrasonic penning [7,11]. The fatigue strength improvement achieved through these techniques, increases with nominal yield stress and therefore the greatest benefits are obtained for high strength steels [7,9,12,14,15]. Recently, some work has been focused on the application of these steels and post-weld treatments in the medium cycle regime, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to obtain the desired improvements with the post-weld techniques, it is necessary that the as welded joints and the improved welded joints, in case of rewelding treatments, have certain quality requirements, to ensure the absence of welding defects, or its limitation, as well as the fulfillment of certain requirements on bead geometry [14,27,28]. Although the existing weld class system [29,30] will guarantee the requirements of industrial quality control, it doesn't allow relating the quality of the weld joint with its fatigue strength in an efficient way [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%