2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of weld geometry on the fatigue life of non-load-carrying fillet welded cruciform joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For non-load carrying welds, the throat size has an even minor influence. The local weld toe geometry and its radius are instead of the highest importance [7,9]. This influence is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Weld Quality and Weld Demandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For non-load carrying welds, the throat size has an even minor influence. The local weld toe geometry and its radius are instead of the highest importance [7,9]. This influence is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Weld Quality and Weld Demandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such parameters to be considered are flank angle, weld toe and weld throat thickness [6][7][8]. The definitions of flank angle, h and weld toe radius, q are described in Fig.…”
Section: Geometrical Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the radius has shown to have strong influence on fatigue life according to, among others, Lee et al [8] and Jonsson et al [5], it is therefore included in corporate weld standards, such as Volvo standard 181-0004 [9]. Since this demand is rather company-specific and not included in the common standard ISO 5817 [10], there is also no existing common evaluation method used.…”
Section: Fig 2 Illustration Of Weld Toe Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%