2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of weight-adjusted intermediate-dose versus fixed-dose prophylactic anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin on venous thromboembolism among noncritically and critically ill patients with COVID-19: the COVI-DOSE trial, a multicenter, randomised, open-label, phase 4 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings align with a metaanalysis by J. Ena and V. Valls [36], where the rate of major bleeding events was reported as 0.99% in not critically ill patients undergoing prophylactic dosages of anticoagulant therapy. Also, another meta-analysis by S. Zuily et al [37], comparing fixed and weight-based dose anticoagulant prophylaxis, found a low rate of major bleeding (1% in the weight base group and 1.3% in the fixed dose group), comparable with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings align with a metaanalysis by J. Ena and V. Valls [36], where the rate of major bleeding events was reported as 0.99% in not critically ill patients undergoing prophylactic dosages of anticoagulant therapy. Also, another meta-analysis by S. Zuily et al [37], comparing fixed and weight-based dose anticoagulant prophylaxis, found a low rate of major bleeding (1% in the weight base group and 1.3% in the fixed dose group), comparable with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We found that length of stay (median days) was significantly longer in patients with a major bleeding event [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] vs. 14 (IQR 8-24), p < 0.0001)] (Table 3). Death was more frequently observed in patients with major bleeding (34.5% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.039).…”
Section: Outcome Of Subjects With a Major Bleeding Eventmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In studies 12 , 32 , 36 , 37 investigating the use of intermediate doses for noncritically ill patients, the intermediate dose showed a statistically significant lower risk of thromboembolism events compared to the prophylactic dose (RR, 0.38; 95% CI: 0.21–0.69) (Fig. 4 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%