Effect of Wearing a Face Mask on Hand-to-Face Contact by Children in a Simulated School Environment

Abstract

ImportanceWearing a face mask in school can reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission but it may also lead to increased hand-to-face contact, which in turn could increase infection risk through self-inoculation.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of wearing a face mask on hand-to-face contact by children while at school.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective randomized clinical trial randomized students from junior kindergarten to grade 12 at 2 schools in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, during August 2020 in a 1:1 ratio to either a mask or control class during a 2-day school simulation. Classes were video recorded from 4 angles to accurately capture outcomes.InterventionsParticipants in the mask arm were instructed to bring their own mask and wear it at all times. Students assigned to control classes were not required to mask at any time (grade 4 and lower) or in the classroom where physical distancing could be maintained (grade 5 and up).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was the number of hand-to-face contacts per student per hour on day 2 of the simulation. Secondary outcomes included hand-to-mucosa contacts and hand-to-nonmucosa contacts. A mixed Poisson regression model was used to derive rate ratios (RRs), adjusted for age and sex with a random intercept for class with bootstrapped 95% CIs.ResultsA total of 174 students underwent randomization and 171 students (mask group, 50.6% male; control group, 52.4% male) attended school on day 2. The rate of hand-to-face contacts did not differ significantly between the mask and the control groups (88.2 vs 88.7 events per student per hour; RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.78-1.28; P = >.99). When compared with the control group, the rate of hand-to-mucosa contacts was significantly lower in the mask group (RR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.07-0.21), while the rate of hand-to-nonmucosa contacts was higher (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.08-1.82).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this clinical trial of simulated school attendance, hand-to-face contacts did not differ among students required to wear face masks vs students not required to wear face masks; however, hand-to-mucosa contracts were lower in the face mask group. This suggests that mask wearing is unlikely to increase infection risk through self-inoculation.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04531254

Decreasing parvovirus B19 and hepatitis A nucleic acid test positivity rates in Canadian plasma donors following the initiation of COVID‐19 restriction in March 2020

“…Public health communications on the importance of hand hygiene may have additionally reduced the opportunity for faecal‐oral transmission in the community, schools and facilities [21]. Masking mandates may have also reduced infection rates by reducing the rate of hand‐to‐mucosa contacts in individuals [22]. Further analysis of B19V and HAV data from 2023 onwards will identify changing trends in epidemiology as patterns of transmission are likely to be re‐established.…”

Addressing adverse synergies between chemical and biological pollutants at schools—The ‘SynAir‐G’ hypothesis

“…The risk of transmission of SARS-CoV2 in schools has attracted a lot of attention; while the extent and relative importance of this mode of transmission is still scrutinized, there is no doubt that viral transmission either through aerosols or by hand contact is important. 58 Typically, high peaks of respiratory infections, followed by asthma attacks in susceptible individuals and their families, take place during the month of September in the Northern Hemisphere, coinciding with the return of schoolchildren after their summer vacation-the socalled 'September epidemic', 59 attributed mostly to rhinoviruses. At the same time, cat allergens, brought from home on the clothes of children are present in increased concentrations within classrooms.…”

Protecting school communities from COVID-19 and other infectious disease outbreaks: the urgent need for healthy schools in Aotearoa New Zealand

“…Conduct a trial and survey of high-quality childsized respirator masks in school settings to identify enablers and barriers to mask use and test mitigation strategies, along the lines of the randomised clinical trial by Science et al 71 Conduct a qualitative study to develop best practice guidelines for enabling access to communication when staff and students are masked, including technological and behavioural strategies (e.g., microphones and amplifiers), slower speech patterns, reduced background noise, clear face masks, written or electronic text (including live captions) and non-verbal communication (e.g., using gestures or hand signals).…”