2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of water management on dry seeded and puddled transplanted rice. Part 1: Crop performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
55
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
11
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tiller density at 35 DAT had higher than at flowering and it was due to some tiller mortality after panicle formation. Similar results were reported by Hasanuzzaman et al, 2009;Sudhir-Yadav et al, 2011. Tiller density was higher when plots received nitrogen source of 50% cowdung + 50% prilled urea with season long weed-free.…”
Section: Rice Tillersupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Tiller density at 35 DAT had higher than at flowering and it was due to some tiller mortality after panicle formation. Similar results were reported by Hasanuzzaman et al, 2009;Sudhir-Yadav et al, 2011. Tiller density was higher when plots received nitrogen source of 50% cowdung + 50% prilled urea with season long weed-free.…”
Section: Rice Tillersupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Slightly lower but significantly similar grain yield was recorded from the reduced and strip tillage DSR (Figure 2). From many previous studies, it is found that yield of DSR and PTR almost similar if managed well [8,9] lower yield was also recorded from many previous studies where weeds were not managed well [10,11]. Some studies in DSR reported higher yield in strip tillage condition than reduced tillage where weed pressure was very low [2].…”
Section: Grain Yieldmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, grain yield is less stable in aerobic culture than in conventional flooded culture, mainly owing to a smaller spikelet number per unit area and a smaller single-grain weight Kato et al, 2006;Peng et al, 2006;Matsuo and Mochizuki, 2009;Sudhir-Yadav et al, 2011). Kato and Katsura (2010) showed that the spikelet number per unit area in aerobic rice culture was determined by biomass production during the late reproductive period and by nitrogen uptake until 2 weeks before heading, as was shown by Yoshida et al (2006) in rice plants grown in flooded culture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerobic rice culture, in which rice is grown in non-puddled soil under aerobic conditions, is a rice production system that requires less water than conventional flooded rice culture (Humphreys et al, 2010). In addition, aerobic rice culture is particularly productive when used with high-yielding cultivars and adequate crop management (George et al, 2002;Kato et al, 2009;Sudhir-Yadav et al, 2011). Thus, aerobic rice culture is a promising rice production system that can both save water and achieve high yields.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%