Effect of water-jet flossing on surface roughness and color stability of dental resin-based composites

Alharbi, Mohammed Abdullah Hamad; Farah, Ra’fat I.

doi:10.4317/jced.56153

Cited by 9 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results of the present study are somewhat consistent with a study by Alharbi et al . ( 15 ), in which the 50-PSI pressure of Aquarius OID did not change the surface roughness of composite resin materials, while the maximum pressure of the device (100 PSI) resulted in significant changes in the surface roughness of some composite resins. Microhybrid composite resins with spherical particles (Estelite Sigma Quik, Ceram Sphere) exhibited greater increases in surface roughness than other microhybrid composite reins (Z250, Tetric Evo-Ceram).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…The mechanism of action of OID relies on the high pressure of its solution. In this context, the shearing forces emanating from the device with its continuous application might result in the failure of the filler–matrix interface, separating fillers from the resin matrix, which is more probable in composite resins with large filler particles ( 15 ). In this line, hybrid composite resins exhibit poor performance and undergo greater wear.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It has been reported to be safe concerning the effect of water pressure on gingival and junctional epithelium attachments ( 14 ). The main concern with the use of this device is the possible effect of pressure and type of the irrigation solution on increasing surface roughness and the loss of the luster of polymer-based restorative materials (i.e., composite resins) since these materials exhibit less hardness than the tooth enamel and have a heterogeneous structure ( 15 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Alharbi et al . ( 15 ) evaluated the water-jet device on the surface roughness of different composite resin materials, in which an increase in the pressure of the device significantly increased surface roughness in composite resins with spherical fillers (Estelite Sigma Quick, Ceramic Sphere) compared to other composite resins.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Effect of oral irrigation device and its solution type on the surface roughness and topography of Bulk-fill composite resins

Naser-Alavi¹,

Salari²,

Moein³

et al. 2022

J Clin Exp Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Surface roughness and topography of composite resin materials have a significant role in biofilm aggregation, periodontitis, and recurrent caries. The present study evaluated the effect of the Waterpik oral irrigation device (OID) with different solution [water/ chlorhexidine (CHX)] on the surface roughness and topography of microhybrid (x-tra fil) and nanohybrid (Tetric N-Ceram Bulk) bulk-fill composite resins. Material and Methods Disk-shaped samples were prepared from each composite resin, measuring 5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height, and assigned to three groups in terms of treatment (n=19): group A, control (storage in distilled water); group B, OID with water; group C, OID with 0.5% CHX. The samples were treated for eight weeks, simulating one-year use of OID. Profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to evaluate and compare quantitatively surface roughness (Ra) and qualitative topography of composite resin surfaces before and after treatment. The data were analyzed with paired-samples, Wilcoxon, and generalized estimating equations tests (α=0.05). Results The application of OID increased the Ra of composite resin compared to the control group ( P <0.001). No significant difference was detected between the two solutions (water and CHX) (P=0.615). The effect of composite resin type and the cumulative effect of composite resin type and OID solution were not significant on the surface roughness changes of the samples ( P =0.243 and P =0.464, respectively). Conclusions OID with water and CHX solutions increased the surface roughness and topographic changes of microhybrid and nanohybrid bulk-fill composite resins. Key words: Composite resins, irrigation, mouthrinse, surface roughness, topography.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effect of oral irrigation device and its solution type on the surface roughness and topography of Bulk-fill composite resins

Naser-Alavi¹,

Salari²,

Moein³

et al. 2022

J Clin Exp Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A smaller smear layer signified less need for acid etching and less damage. Furthermore, the specimen drilled by a water jet was characterized by a rough surface [40]. Formation of striation and exposure of enamel rods increased the area of adhesive bonding and the retention of filling [2].…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

Water jet as a novel technique for enamel drilling ex vivo

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To investigate the usage of a water jet for enamel drilling ex vivo, 210 individual extracted molars without lesions or fillings were collected. Then, the specimens were drilled by a water jet or a high-speed dental drill. The cavities of 50 teeth were reconstructed digitally by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to measure the height and width. The cavities of 10 teeth were longitudinally incised and their surfaces were observed by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). After the cavities were filled, 50 fillings were vertically incised. The bonding interface between tooth and filling was observed by SEM. 50 teeth with fillings were stained in 0.1% rhodamine B solution, and then the dye penetration between tooth and filling was observed under the stereomicroscope and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The bonding strength between enamel and filling of 50 teeth was simulated and predicted with finite element analysis (FEA). At 140–150 MPa and for 2–3 s, cavities were made with a depth of approximately 764 μm in each tooth. SEM showed the cavity surface in the water jet group had a more irregular concave and convex structure than that in the high-speed dental drill group. There was a trend that the microleakage and bonding width was smaller in the water jet group than in the high-speed dental drill group. FEA indicated that the stress on the resin surface was greater than on the enamel surface in the water jet group. Compared with the tooth drilled by a high-speed dental drill, the tooth drilled by a water jet gained better retention of the filling material and suffered less bonding strength on the enamel surface. Water jet drilling is effective for enamel drilling.

show abstract

Oral Irrigation Devices: A Scoping Review

Sarkisova,

Morse,

Lee

et al. 2024

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesSelf‐performed oral hygiene is essential for preventing dental caries, periodontal, and peri‐implant diseases. Oral irrigators are adjunctive oral home care aids that may benefit oral health. However, the effects of oral irrigation on oral health, its role in oral home care, and its mechanism of action are not fully understood. A comprehensive search of the literature revealed no existing broad scoping reviews on oral irrigators. Therefore, this study aimed to provide a comprehensive systematic review of the literature on oral irrigation devices and identify evidence gaps.MethodsThe Joanna Briggs Institute and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines were utilized to prepare the review. Four databases and eight gray literature sources were searched for English publications across any geographical location or setting.ResultsTwo hundred and seventy‐five sources were included, predominantly from scientific journals and academic settings. Most studies originated from North America. Research primarily involved adults, with limited studies in children and adolescents. Oral irrigation was safe and well‐accepted when used appropriately. It reduced periodontal inflammation, potentially by modulating the oral microbiota, but further research needs to clarify its mechanism of action. Promising results were reported in populations with dental implants and special needs. Patient acceptance appeared high, but standardized patient‐reported outcome measures were rarely used. Anti‐inflammatory benefits occurred consistently across populations and irrigant solutions. Plaque reduction findings were mixed, potentially reflecting differences in study designs and devices.ConclusionsOral irrigators reduce periodontal inflammation, but their impact on plaque removal remains unclear. Well‐designed, sufficiently powered trials of appropriate duration need to assess the clinical, microbiological, and inflammatory responses of the periodontium to oral irrigation, particularly those with periodontitis, dental implants, and special needs. Patient‐reported outcome measures, costs, caries prevention, and environmental impact of oral irrigation need to be compared to other oral hygiene aids.

show abstract

Effect of water-jet flossing on surface roughness and color stability of dental resin-based composites

Cited by 9 publications

References 27 publications

Effect of oral irrigation device and its solution type on the surface roughness and topography of Bulk-fill composite resins

Effect of oral irrigation device and its solution type on the surface roughness and topography of Bulk-fill composite resins

Water jet as a novel technique for enamel drilling ex vivo

Oral Irrigation Devices: A Scoping Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About