2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1581650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Wall Characteristics on the Behaviors of Reflected Gas Molecules in a Thermal Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The impinging gas molecules were considered to interact only with the wall and the Morse potential values with larger 1 Ar -Pt (about 1.859 £ 10 221 J, twice of that in this paper) were used for the gas -wall interactions. Since a stronger gaswall interaction potential will lead to more accommodation with the wall, the non-equilibrium EAC for smooth walls in [14] (0.43) and [15] (0.41 -0.49) is larger than the data in our simulations (all less than 0.2). Therefore, the interaction potential and the related parameters in MD simulation should be paid more attention to.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The impinging gas molecules were considered to interact only with the wall and the Morse potential values with larger 1 Ar -Pt (about 1.859 £ 10 221 J, twice of that in this paper) were used for the gas -wall interactions. Since a stronger gaswall interaction potential will lead to more accommodation with the wall, the non-equilibrium EAC for smooth walls in [14] (0.43) and [15] (0.41 -0.49) is larger than the data in our simulations (all less than 0.2). Therefore, the interaction potential and the related parameters in MD simulation should be paid more attention to.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Yamamoto [14] and Yamamoto et al [15] also calculated the non-equilibrium EAC for Ar gas and Pt wall interactions in a micro-thermal conduction problem using MD method coupled with DSMC method. The impinging gas molecules were considered to interact only with the wall and the Morse potential values with larger 1 Ar -Pt (about 1.859 £ 10 221 J, twice of that in this paper) were used for the gas -wall interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In their simulations, the accommodation coefficients were definitely influenced by the roughness and the adsorbed gas molecules above the surface. It was confusing that the EAC values on rough surfaces [15] were smaller than those coefficients on smooth surfaces. Generally speaking, roughness always induces more flow resistance so that the TMAC and EAC in rough channels must be larger than those in smooth channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, even in smooth surfaces, the atom arrangement of the wall materials would induce atomic roughness from the atomic viewpoint and also affect the fluid flow and heat transfer [19]. Since the aforementioned roughness in reference [15] is about 0.5 nm, which is also on the atomic scale, the effect of atomic roughness in various lattice configurations was considered as one part. In the following sections, the concepts of the accommodation coefficients are explained to introduce the algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation