2000
DOI: 10.3233/ies-2000-0033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of visual feedback and verbal encouragement on concentric quadriceps and hamstrings peak torque of males and females

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
61
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Burnett et al (2007) noted that the reliability of EMGs from submaximal isometric contractions was improved by visual feedback. The generally positive effects of both verbal and visual feedback on the peak torque from MVCs have also been well documented, recently by Campenella et al (2000). Finally, the way in which MVCs are elicited has also been reported to influence both muscle activity and peak torque.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Burnett et al (2007) noted that the reliability of EMGs from submaximal isometric contractions was improved by visual feedback. The generally positive effects of both verbal and visual feedback on the peak torque from MVCs have also been well documented, recently by Campenella et al (2000). Finally, the way in which MVCs are elicited has also been reported to influence both muscle activity and peak torque.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A CV was calculated and another trial taken, if necessary, to ensure that subjects had three force measures with variability less than 10% (Agre et al, 1987). All subjects received strong verbal encouragement during testing (Campenella et al, 2000). The muscle testing order was randomized to account for ordering bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior works have shown that use of straps can facilitate reliability for generating a MVIC [2,27,35,46]. We also gave strong verbal encouragement, a proven technique for eliciting a maximum contraction [12] and practice to familiarize themselves with the task. We believe that the combination of positioning, verbal encouragement, and task familiarization facilitated a subject's ability to perform a reliable MVIC as evidence by the calculated ICC of 0.92.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For testing purposes, subjects performed three MVICs using the ''make test'' and rested 1 min between each effort to minimize fatigue. The principal investigator provided strong verbal encouragement to facilitate subjects' ability to perform a MVIC [12]. To determine reference values for the mean and peak dynamic normalization methods, subjects performed 15 repetitions of active right hip abduction (0-25 degrees) in the sidelying position with no load (no ankle weight) at a rate of 60 beats per minute.…”
Section: Reference Muscle Activation For Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%