Abstract:Oral malodour is considered to be caused by the proteolytic activity of anaerobic Gram-negative oral bacteria. In a previous study, it was shown that these bacteria were susceptible to blue light (wavelengths of 400-500 nm). In this study, the effect of blue light on malodour production by mixed oral microflora was tested in a salivary incubation assay. Whole saliva samples were exposed to a xenon light source for 30, 60, 120 and 240 s, equivalent to fluences of 34, 68, 137 and 274 J cm À2 , respectively. Malo… Show more
“…photodynamic treatment) has been reported in the literature (Wilson, 1994;Henry et al, 1995Henry et al, , 1996Konig et al, 2000;Soukos et al, 2005), and it has been suggested that this effect is mediated through the production of ROS (Gourmelon et al, 1994). This hypothesis is further supported by the observation that obligate anaerobic oral bacteria (pigmented and non-pigmented) are more susceptible to blue light exposure treatment than facultative ones (Feuerstein et al, 2004;Sterer & Feuerstein, 2005). Various studies have reported that using the colourant erythrosine B as a photosensitizer enhances the antimicrobial properties of blue light from light-emitting diode (LED) or halogen light sources (De Lucca et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…A previous study has demonstrated that exposing mixed planktonic bacteria from saliva to non-coherent blue light results in reduced malodour production in a salivary incubation assay (Sterer & Feuerstein, 2005). In the present study, an experimental biofilm system was utilized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have demonstrated the antibacterial effect of visible light applied with or without exogenous photosensitizers (Wilson, 1994;Henry et al, 1995Henry et al, , 1996Konig et al, 2000;Soukos et al, 2005;Sterer & Feuerstein, 2005). It was further suggested that light-induced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is the mechanism underlying this phototoxic effect (Gourmelon et al, 1994).…”
Oral malodour is thought to be caused mainly by the production of volatile sulfide compounds (VSCs) by anaerobic Gram-negative oral bacteria. Previous studies have shown that these bacteria are susceptible to blue light (400-500 nm wavelength). In the present study, we tested the effect of blue light in the presence of zinc, erythrosine B or both on malodour production in an experimental oral biofilm. Biofilms were exposed to a plasma-arc light source for 30, 60 and 120 s (equal to energy fluxes of 41, 82 and 164 J cm "2 , respectively) with or without the addition of zinc acetate, erythrosine B or both. After the light exposure, biofilm samples were examined for malodour production (by an odour judge) and VSC production (with a Halimeter), and VSCproducing bacteria were quantified using a microscopy-based sulfide assay (MSA) and in situ confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Results showed that exposing experimental oral biofilm to both blue light and zinc reduced malodour production, which coincided with a reduction in VSC-producing bacteria in the biofilm. These results suggest that zinc enhances the phototoxicity of blue light against malodour-producing bacteria.
“…photodynamic treatment) has been reported in the literature (Wilson, 1994;Henry et al, 1995Henry et al, , 1996Konig et al, 2000;Soukos et al, 2005), and it has been suggested that this effect is mediated through the production of ROS (Gourmelon et al, 1994). This hypothesis is further supported by the observation that obligate anaerobic oral bacteria (pigmented and non-pigmented) are more susceptible to blue light exposure treatment than facultative ones (Feuerstein et al, 2004;Sterer & Feuerstein, 2005). Various studies have reported that using the colourant erythrosine B as a photosensitizer enhances the antimicrobial properties of blue light from light-emitting diode (LED) or halogen light sources (De Lucca et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…A previous study has demonstrated that exposing mixed planktonic bacteria from saliva to non-coherent blue light results in reduced malodour production in a salivary incubation assay (Sterer & Feuerstein, 2005). In the present study, an experimental biofilm system was utilized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have demonstrated the antibacterial effect of visible light applied with or without exogenous photosensitizers (Wilson, 1994;Henry et al, 1995Henry et al, , 1996Konig et al, 2000;Soukos et al, 2005;Sterer & Feuerstein, 2005). It was further suggested that light-induced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is the mechanism underlying this phototoxic effect (Gourmelon et al, 1994).…”
Oral malodour is thought to be caused mainly by the production of volatile sulfide compounds (VSCs) by anaerobic Gram-negative oral bacteria. Previous studies have shown that these bacteria are susceptible to blue light (400-500 nm wavelength). In the present study, we tested the effect of blue light in the presence of zinc, erythrosine B or both on malodour production in an experimental oral biofilm. Biofilms were exposed to a plasma-arc light source for 30, 60 and 120 s (equal to energy fluxes of 41, 82 and 164 J cm "2 , respectively) with or without the addition of zinc acetate, erythrosine B or both. After the light exposure, biofilm samples were examined for malodour production (by an odour judge) and VSC production (with a Halimeter), and VSCproducing bacteria were quantified using a microscopy-based sulfide assay (MSA) and in situ confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Results showed that exposing experimental oral biofilm to both blue light and zinc reduced malodour production, which coincided with a reduction in VSC-producing bacteria in the biofilm. These results suggest that zinc enhances the phototoxicity of blue light against malodour-producing bacteria.
“…Consequently, the saliva-putrefaction system has shown that green tea, mints and toothpaste exhibited encouraging values that dispose one to accept these products as efficient VSC inhibitors. A saliva-putrefaction system has been employed in other studies to determine the efficacy of products in reducing oral malodor (23)(24)(25). However, when a treatment is carried out on saliva itself, as in this study, in vitro results do not always conform to in vivo results.…”
Summary Many food products are claimed to be effective in controlling halitosis. Halitosis is caused mainly by volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) such as H 2 S and CH 3 SH produced in the oral cavity. Oral microorganisms degrade proteinaceous substrates to cysteine and methionine, which are then converted to VSCs. Most treatments for halitosis focus on controlling the number of microorganisms in the oral cavity. Since tea polyphenols have been shown to have antimicrobial and deodorant effects, we have investigated whether green tea powder reduces VSCs in mouth air, and compared its effectiveness with that of other foods which are claimed to control halitosis. Immediately after administrating the products, green tea showed the largest reduction in concentration of both H 2 S and CH 3 SH gases, especially CH 3 SH which also demonstrated a better correlation with odor strength than H 2 S; however, no reduction was observed at 1, 2 and 3 h after administration. Chewing gum, mints and parsley-seed oil product did not reduce the concentration of VSCs in mouth air at any time. Toothpaste, mints and green tea strongly inhibited VSCs production in a saliva-putrefaction system, but chewing gum and parsley-seed oil product could not inhibit saliva putrefaction. Toothpaste and green tea also demonstrated strong deodorant activities in vitro, but no significant deodorant activity of mints, chewing gum or parsley-seed oil product were observed. We concluded that green tea was very effective in reducing oral malodor temporarily because of its disinfectant and deodorant activities, whereas other foods were not effective.
“…Halimeters ® are now mostly used in dental clinics [122][123][124][125]. However, a Halimeter does not identify the composition of sulfur compounds.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.