SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1990 1990
DOI: 10.1190/1.1890030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of viscoelasticity and anisotropy on amplitude‐versus‐offset interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct measurements using vertical seismic profiling (VSP) (Hauge, 1981;Hedlin et al, 2001), well logs (Schmitt, 1999), and rock samples (Behura et al, 2007;Winkler & Nur, 1982) show that attenuation and velocity dispersion can be significant, especially within hydrocarbon-saturated zones. Therefore, some failures of conventional AVO analysis can be attributed to the influence of attenuation (Luh, 1988;Samec et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct measurements using vertical seismic profiling (VSP) (Hauge, 1981;Hedlin et al, 2001), well logs (Schmitt, 1999), and rock samples (Behura et al, 2007;Winkler & Nur, 1982) show that attenuation and velocity dispersion can be significant, especially within hydrocarbon-saturated zones. Therefore, some failures of conventional AVO analysis can be attributed to the influence of attenuation (Luh, 1988;Samec et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%