1971
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(71)90086-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of venting on cast gold full crowns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite differences in the rheological behavior with initially higher flowability and earlier increase in viscosity of GC FujiCEM 2 (B) compared to Multilink Automix (A), the cement material did not influence the marginal gap. While improved marginal accuracy was found when vented metal crowns (Bassett, ; Cooper et al., ; Cruz et al., ) or all‐ceramic crowns (Clark et al., ) were used, marginal gap width was not affected by the cementation technique (SP, CA, PV) in the current materials using CAD/CAM technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Despite differences in the rheological behavior with initially higher flowability and earlier increase in viscosity of GC FujiCEM 2 (B) compared to Multilink Automix (A), the cement material did not influence the marginal gap. While improved marginal accuracy was found when vented metal crowns (Bassett, ; Cooper et al., ; Cruz et al., ) or all‐ceramic crowns (Clark et al., ) were used, marginal gap width was not affected by the cementation technique (SP, CA, PV) in the current materials using CAD/CAM technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In fact, the importance of venting as described in the literature is significant. Cooper and others found that the venting of castings reduced the mean marginal opening by 45 microns, 22 as did Van Nortwick and Gettleman, where the seating of crowns improved by 290 microns with venting. 6 Kaufman and others showed a retention increase between 19% and 32%, while improving seating by 175 microns.…”
Section: Ventingmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Some studies reported values between 40 and 120μm (17)(18)(19) . Other studies reported wider marginal discrepancy up to 180 μm (20)(21)(22) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%