2005
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-918903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of VEGF on Tail Artery Interpositional LOOP (TAIL) Flap: A Rodent Model for Flap Prefabrication

Abstract: The authors introduce an experimental model of flap prefabrication, the tail artery interpositional loop (TAIL) flap. In this model, an arterial segment from a rat tail is used to create an arteriovenous (A-V) fistula. This fistula is positioned beneath the abdominal skin flap to vascularize the overlying tissue, and a barrier of Silastic sheeting is placed below the fistula to prevent vascular ingrowth from the underlying bed. The efficacy of this new model was tested by investigating the effect of a single t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…41,60,111 Stebbins used a tail artery interpositional loop (TAIL), an artificially created arteriovenous fistula, to supply an abdominal flap as an experimental prefabricated flap model in rats. 41 Single topical application of rhVEGF 165 increased flap survival areas significantly compared with controls at 2, 3, and 4 weeks postapplication (37% versus 27%, 48% versus 35%, and 74.3% versus 50%, respectively). No significant difference was found at 1 week (14.8% versus 12.5%), which indicated that the possible mechanism was neovascularization, a slower process than vasodilation.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Acute Phase Effects Of Vegfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41,60,111 Stebbins used a tail artery interpositional loop (TAIL), an artificially created arteriovenous fistula, to supply an abdominal flap as an experimental prefabricated flap model in rats. 41 Single topical application of rhVEGF 165 increased flap survival areas significantly compared with controls at 2, 3, and 4 weeks postapplication (37% versus 27%, 48% versus 35%, and 74.3% versus 50%, respectively). No significant difference was found at 1 week (14.8% versus 12.5%), which indicated that the possible mechanism was neovascularization, a slower process than vasodilation.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Acute Phase Effects Of Vegfmentioning
confidence: 99%