2021
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2021.1936213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of vegetation structure on above ground biomass in tropical deciduous forests of Central India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ecological disturbances have sound impacts over the forest structure and composition, while more disturbed forests have lower biomass and species richness. The recorded tree species richness in the present study was quite high compared with the earlier reports from the tropical mixed deciduous forests of Jabalpur (28 species) (Fayiah et al, 2018) and tropical deciduous forests of Satpura Tiger Reserve (54 species) (Lal et al, 2021), but it is comparable with the tropical deciduous forests of Jharkhand (137 species) . The higher species richness and its spatial variations in different forested grids in our study were mainly due to varying degree of anthropogenic disturbances, diverse habitat, topography, prevailing microclimate, and seasonality during the study periods (as the present study was conducted throughout the year irrespective of seasons) .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ecological disturbances have sound impacts over the forest structure and composition, while more disturbed forests have lower biomass and species richness. The recorded tree species richness in the present study was quite high compared with the earlier reports from the tropical mixed deciduous forests of Jabalpur (28 species) (Fayiah et al, 2018) and tropical deciduous forests of Satpura Tiger Reserve (54 species) (Lal et al, 2021), but it is comparable with the tropical deciduous forests of Jharkhand (137 species) . The higher species richness and its spatial variations in different forested grids in our study were mainly due to varying degree of anthropogenic disturbances, diverse habitat, topography, prevailing microclimate, and seasonality during the study periods (as the present study was conducted throughout the year irrespective of seasons) .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…In accord with the present study, T . grandis was the most dominant tree species in tropical deciduous forests of Satpura Tiger Reserve (13.5% of total tree density) (Lal et al, 2021) and in the Mudumalai forest region (12% of total tree density) (Kishore et al, 2020), and the four most dominant tree species had contributed 45.24% and 32.60% of the total tree density, respectively. On the contrary, Kydia calycina Roxb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our objective in this study was to identify subsidence rates in used and restored peatland based on interferometric synthetic aperture radar data from Sentinel-1A products (D-InSAR). The advantage of SAR products is their ability to record data from the Earth's surface without depending on cloud conditions, which is often a major obstacle for remote-sensing products, for example, multispectral data (Shimada et al, 2016;Lees et al, 2018;Lal et al, 2021). The C-band dual-polarization Sentinel-1 data serve as an advantageous tool for monitoring tropical peatland and discriminating peat depth classes (Khakim et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our purpose in this study was to identify subsidence on a yearly basis, we selected the D-InSAR method as appropriate for application. Natural conditions such as peatland moisture content, atmospheric conditions, and vegetation canopy can affect the results of D-InSAR analysis (Khakim et al, 2020;Lal et al, 2021;Tampuu et al, 2021). Soil moisture is an important factor in determining the penetration depth of the radar signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LULCC affects biogeochemistry (Mahowald et al, 2017), biophysical (Duveiller et al, 2020), and biogeographical (Hibbard et al, 2010) attributes of the terrestrial surface (Kabat et al, 2004;Govorushko, 2016) and also modifies the concentration of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere, thereby affecting the atmospheric chemical composition (Pielke et al, 1998;Hibbard et al, 2010;Lal et al, 2020a;Lal et al, 2021a). The changes in biodiversity in the form of alteration of flora and fauna by the introduction of invasive species aggravate the bio-geographical composition on the surface (Clavero, 2016;Forstmaier et al, 2020;Saikia et al, 2020;Lal et al, 2021b). The significant change in the biogeophysical properties largely by anthropogenic activities leads to the imbalance in surface energy budget by modifications of albedo cover, surface roughness, evapotranspiration (ET), and leaf area index (LAI) (Lee et al, 2011;Lal et al, 2019;Zhang and Ye, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%