1967
DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1967.212.6.1361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of vasopressin on proximal tubule sodium reabsorption in the dog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1976
1976

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interpretation of the free water clearance experiments is based on the postulate that, in the absence of antidiuretic hormone, the clearance of free water is determined primarily by the volume of fluid that reaches the diluting segment of the nephron and this volume, in turn, by the glomerular filtration rate and fractional reabsorption by the proximal tubule. In the present experiments, the delivery of tubule fluid from the proximal tubule during water diuresis probably approximates that during hydropenia since fractional sodium reabsorption by the proximal tubule of the dog is not affected by infusion of 50 ml/kg of 2.5%o dextrose in water (12). Infusion of hyperoncotic albumin solution resulted in a significant increase in free water clearance, from a mean of 4.93 to 11.82 ml/100 ml GFR/min (P < 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The interpretation of the free water clearance experiments is based on the postulate that, in the absence of antidiuretic hormone, the clearance of free water is determined primarily by the volume of fluid that reaches the diluting segment of the nephron and this volume, in turn, by the glomerular filtration rate and fractional reabsorption by the proximal tubule. In the present experiments, the delivery of tubule fluid from the proximal tubule during water diuresis probably approximates that during hydropenia since fractional sodium reabsorption by the proximal tubule of the dog is not affected by infusion of 50 ml/kg of 2.5%o dextrose in water (12). Infusion of hyperoncotic albumin solution resulted in a significant increase in free water clearance, from a mean of 4.93 to 11.82 ml/100 ml GFR/min (P < 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The reasons for the variable blood pressure changes after vasopressin are unknown, but they may represent differences' in individual responsiveness to the given dose of vasopressin. An inhibitory effect of vasopressin on proximal tubule sodium reabsorption has not been demonstrated previously (4)(5)(6). The earlier micropuncture studies were carried out because there may be stimulation of sodium transport by vasopressin as suggested by toad bladder studies (14), but such a stimulatory effect could not be shown except in the isolated collecting tubules (15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because of the concomitant phosphaturia, they concluded that vasopressin exerts natriuresis by stimulating the production of cyclic AMP in the proximal tubule of the kidney, thereby reducing its sodium and phosphate reabsorption. On the other hand, the available micropuncture studies in the literature (4)(5)(6) failed to demonstrate any effect of vasopressin on proximal tubule sodium transport in the animals undergoing water diuresis. Our present micropuncture study was undertaken to reexamine whether proximal tubule transport of sodium and phosphate could be altered in thyroparathyroidectomized (TPTX) dogs by administration of vasopressin in the doses frequently employed in experimental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In dogs and rats vasopressin does not alter the water permeability of 85 86 A.M. BEAL the proximal convoluted tubule (Clapp, Watson & Berliner, 1963;Gertz, Kennedy & Ullrich, 1964;UWrich, Rumrich & Fuchs, 1964) or the loop of Henle (Wirz, 1956;Gottschalk, 1961;Morgan & Berliner, 1968). Likewise Davis, Knox & Berliner (1967) found no evidence of sodium reabsorption in the proximal tubule being altered by vasopressin although some earlier reports suggest that vasopressin might stimulate sodium reabsorption in this segment (Clapp et al, 1963;Gottschalk, cited by Gertz et aL, 1964). In the rat various lines of evidence indicate that the distal convoluted tubule is one site of action of vasopressin on water reabsorption (Wirz, 1956;Gottschalk & Mylle, 1959;Darmady, Durant, Matthews & Stranack, 1960) but in other species such as dog, monkey and Meriones the distal tubule does not show the same responsiveness to the hormone (Clapp & Robinson, 1966;Bennett, Brenner & Berliner, 1968;Rouffignac, Lechene, Guinnebault & Morel, 1969).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%