2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of varying reinforcement content on the mechanical properties of hemp-recycled HDPE composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the obtained results, the tensile strength and tensile modulus of the prepared RHDPE/WGP composite without a compatibilizer, as in samples S 5,0 , S 10,0 , S 20,0 and S 30,0 ,decreased with increasing glass reinforcement particle content, as shown in Figure 4 . This result could be attributed to the imperfect adhesion between the polymer matrix and glass particles [ 19 ], which led to an aggregation of glass particles (confirmed from SEM images in the next section) and that in turn made the reinforcement particles unable to support stress transferred from the polymer matrix [ 10 , 20 ]. Furthermore, the concentration of stress at the particle-matrix interface region leads to weakness of the particle-matrix interaction and consequently reduces the tensile strength [ 21 ].In other words, the tensile strength is a function of the surface contact area and the interfacial strength, the modulus is a function of the surface contact area, and filler agglomeration affects both factors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the obtained results, the tensile strength and tensile modulus of the prepared RHDPE/WGP composite without a compatibilizer, as in samples S 5,0 , S 10,0 , S 20,0 and S 30,0 ,decreased with increasing glass reinforcement particle content, as shown in Figure 4 . This result could be attributed to the imperfect adhesion between the polymer matrix and glass particles [ 19 ], which led to an aggregation of glass particles (confirmed from SEM images in the next section) and that in turn made the reinforcement particles unable to support stress transferred from the polymer matrix [ 10 , 20 ]. Furthermore, the concentration of stress at the particle-matrix interface region leads to weakness of the particle-matrix interaction and consequently reduces the tensile strength [ 21 ].In other words, the tensile strength is a function of the surface contact area and the interfacial strength, the modulus is a function of the surface contact area, and filler agglomeration affects both factors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, some micro-cracks on their fractured surfaces, due to the poor interfacial adhesion between fibers and the PEr matrix, resulting from the tensile stress act as stress concentration points and facilitate easy failure. 55 According to Deepak et al, 58 high reinforcement content induces the generation of fiber aggregates; causing pulled out and voids . Similar behavior also was observed by Ariawan et al and Singh et al
Figure 11.SEM images of fractured tensile specimens for PEr and PEr/15PR and PEr/15PR-C composites.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, some micro-cracks on their fractured surfaces, due to the poor interfacial adhesion between fibers and the PEr matrix, resulting from the tensile stress act as stress concentration points and facilitate easy failure. 55 According to Deepak et al, 58 The SEM image of PEr/15PR-C composite shown in Figure 11(c) reveals the coupling agent used also caused the fiber pull-out phenomenon in bundled form and welldefined holes created in the matrix owing to fiber pull out (delamination). This could be attributed to weak fibermatrix adhesion.…”
Section: Thermogravimetric Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Research has shown that the addition of alumina as a reinforcing filler in the HDPE matrix promotes changes in the thermal, physical and mechanical properties of the composite, as well as changes in the crystallinity of the polymer. The effects presented by the authors showed an increase in the modulus of elasticity of up to 501% compared to the pure matrix [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%