“…52,53 In our recent study, we reported that CsPbI 3 absorber layer-based device with CBTS as HTL exhibited PCE of 16.71%, 17.90%, 17.86%, 14.47%, 17.76%, 17.82% with PCBM, TiO 2 , ZnO, C 60 , IGZO, WS 2 ETL respectively. 14 Another study demonstrates that using SnO 2 as ETL and CuSCN as HTL with MAPbI 3 absorber demonstrated a high PCE of 27%. 52 Therefore, more research needs to be done to investigate the device performance of PSCs for different ETL, HTL, and back contact metals with lead-free perovskite absorber layers, to outperform Shockley Queisser's (SQ) efficiency limit for a single solar cell.…”