2020
DOI: 10.4103/fjs.fjs_71_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of various analgesics combined with ropivacaine on pain, sensory-motor block and hemodynamic changes in intravenous regional anesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…concluded that dexmedetomidine could reduce pain and opioid consumption and have faster and longer onset of block in comparing different adjuvants to ropivacaine in IV regional anesthesia including dexmedetomidine, ketamine, neostigmine, and magnesium sulfate. [ 14 ] Furthermore, Alayurt et al . reported their study about the addition of sufentanil, tramadol, and clonidine to lidocaine (lignocaine) for IV regional anesthesia, concluding that the addition shortened the onset of sensory block and relieved tourniquet-related pain and reduced opioid consumption within 24 h but did not affect postoperative pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…concluded that dexmedetomidine could reduce pain and opioid consumption and have faster and longer onset of block in comparing different adjuvants to ropivacaine in IV regional anesthesia including dexmedetomidine, ketamine, neostigmine, and magnesium sulfate. [ 14 ] Furthermore, Alayurt et al . reported their study about the addition of sufentanil, tramadol, and clonidine to lidocaine (lignocaine) for IV regional anesthesia, concluding that the addition shortened the onset of sensory block and relieved tourniquet-related pain and reduced opioid consumption within 24 h but did not affect postoperative pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample size calculation was conducted based on the results of our recent study[ 14 ] and by considering power 80%, confidence interval 95%, and the difference of pain score among groups. Therefore, 32 patients were selected for each group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%