1993
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5173(93)90397-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of vapour pressure on the deposition pattern from solution phase metered dose inhalers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This results in part from the formulation of drug in an ethanolic solution, which evaporates rapidly, leaving many fine droplets in the spray, such that over 10% of the metered dose was contained in droplets small enough to enter the lungs but to be exhaled subsequently. Whole lung deposition values as high as the mean value of 39.7% in this study have also been reported previously for MDI formulations containing a propellant soluble radiolabel, 15,16 which would also comprise rapidly evaporating droplets. When an aqueous solution of fenoterol was delivered by the multidose nebulizer, lung deposition of >30% of the dose was recorded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This results in part from the formulation of drug in an ethanolic solution, which evaporates rapidly, leaving many fine droplets in the spray, such that over 10% of the metered dose was contained in droplets small enough to enter the lungs but to be exhaled subsequently. Whole lung deposition values as high as the mean value of 39.7% in this study have also been reported previously for MDI formulations containing a propellant soluble radiolabel, 15,16 which would also comprise rapidly evaporating droplets. When an aqueous solution of fenoterol was delivered by the multidose nebulizer, lung deposition of >30% of the dose was recorded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Figures 4 and 5 show that the inverse relationship between velocity and droplet size, which is present in the measured data, is adequately captured by model predictions. This confirms the previous findings of Baeckstroem and Nilsson (1988) and Harnor et al (1993) for CFC formulations, as well as those of Clark (1991) and Wigley et al (2002) for HFA formulation. It should be noted that the LISA model predicts a "characteristic droplet size."…”
Section: Velocity and Droplet Sizesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Additional experiments conducted with heating the solution formulation Qvar 50 (at 40° and 55°C) showed a temperature‐dependent reduction in Dv 50. This observation can be expected because heating the formulation will increase the vapor pressure (as described in Table 7 for our experimental pMDIs),25 which increases the rate of atomization of the emitted droplets from the pMDI with a greater initial forward velocity 2,26. This results in a finer aerosol and contributes to the lower particle size of the emitted aerosol 27,28.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%