2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of vacuum removal on consolidation settlement under a combined vacuum and surcharge preloading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the features of large void ratio, high compressibility, and low permeability for dredged soils, the self‐weight consolidation process could take a long time. Different preloading techniques, including electro‐osmosis preloading, vacuum preloading, and surcharge preloading, have been employed to accelerate the consolidation process. Vertical drainage channels are often included in the soil, such as the use of prefabricated vertical drains, sand drains, stone columns, pervious concrete piles, and permeable pipe piles .…”
Section: Optimization Of the Layout Of Horizontal Drainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the features of large void ratio, high compressibility, and low permeability for dredged soils, the self‐weight consolidation process could take a long time. Different preloading techniques, including electro‐osmosis preloading, vacuum preloading, and surcharge preloading, have been employed to accelerate the consolidation process. Vertical drainage channels are often included in the soil, such as the use of prefabricated vertical drains, sand drains, stone columns, pervious concrete piles, and permeable pipe piles .…”
Section: Optimization Of the Layout Of Horizontal Drainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cases 1 and 2, during the construction of the bridge approach (0-6 days), the subbase surface settlement for the filling materials of either FRFC or GCS is close, although the settlement for the filling of FRFC is slightly smaller due to its lightweight. This can be explained by the fact that the excess pore water pressure generated from the filling load increases rapidly due to the fast construction speed and it cannot be effectively dissipated in a short period, leading to most of the load being sustained by the pore water and slow development in the effective stress of soil and associated settlement, as studied by Feng et al (2019) and Ni et al (2019). After the construction of bridge approach is completed since the day of 7, the excess pore water pressure is dissipated with time under the constant load of bridge approach backfill of 6 m and a large increase of associated consolidation settlement of foundation soil can be found from 7 to 10 days.…”
Section: Ground Surface Settlement Of the Bridge Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average degree of consolidation is usually used as one of the criteria for assessing the effectiveness of soil consolidation and improvement [48]. In general, there are two common methods widely used to define the average degree of consolidation [49,50].…”
Section: Geofluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%