2019
DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1707230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of UV-absorbing Contact Lenses on Conjunctival Ultraviolet Autofluorescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is conjecture regarding the location of UVAF, with some reporting greater nasal prevalence 11 , 12 , 41 , while equal nasal and temporal prevalence has also been reported 1 . Similarly, regarding the UVAF area, the nasal conjunctiva has been reported to have greater UVAF changes than temporal 10 , 12 , 41 , 42 , though no statistical difference between nasal and temporal UVAF areas has also been reported 10 , 11 , 43 . In this study considering the four subgroups determined by the presence of nasal and temporal UVAF, there were approximately equal proportions as there were seven participants with only nasal UVAF and eight participants with only temporal UVAF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is conjecture regarding the location of UVAF, with some reporting greater nasal prevalence 11 , 12 , 41 , while equal nasal and temporal prevalence has also been reported 1 . Similarly, regarding the UVAF area, the nasal conjunctiva has been reported to have greater UVAF changes than temporal 10 , 12 , 41 , 42 , though no statistical difference between nasal and temporal UVAF areas has also been reported 10 , 11 , 43 . In this study considering the four subgroups determined by the presence of nasal and temporal UVAF, there were approximately equal proportions as there were seven participants with only nasal UVAF and eight participants with only temporal UVAF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Morphology and adhesion have also been analyzed via scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy [70,76]. Contact lenses themselves have also been noted to have ultraviolet autofluorescence, which could affect microscopic evaluation [77]. Most quantitative methods revolve around removing the microorganisms from the contact lens after the adhering period in order to then quantify the removed population in solution or on a microscope slide.…”
Section: In Vitro Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%