2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of urea-based chemical cleaning on TrOCs rejection by nanofiltration membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research on urea/HCl cleaning of membranes has shown specific cleaning of NF270, resulting in a lesser impact on trace organic compounds (TrOCs) than NaOH/HCl cleaning. This method also slightly increases the pore size slightly and the hydrophilicity of the membrane, marginally affecting zeta potential and membrane crosslinking (Zhou et al, 2023).…”
Section: Nanofiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research on urea/HCl cleaning of membranes has shown specific cleaning of NF270, resulting in a lesser impact on trace organic compounds (TrOCs) than NaOH/HCl cleaning. This method also slightly increases the pore size slightly and the hydrophilicity of the membrane, marginally affecting zeta potential and membrane crosslinking (Zhou et al, 2023).…”
Section: Nanofiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like other membrane-based processes, membrane fouling is a major issue facing by MBR NF . To mitigate membrane fouling, chemical cleaning with NaClO is generally carried out when the transmembrane pressure (TMP) is excessively high, and the cleaning interval is 1–6 weeks for a typical MBR MF . , For a MBR NF , however, this short cleaning interval is generally unfavorable because (1) most commercial NF membranes are vulnerable to chlorine , and (2) cleaning in place is difficult to implement for submerged NF modules. Therefore, a very low fouling rate is essential for the practical use of MBR NF .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 To mitigate membrane fouling, chemical cleaning with NaClO is generally carried out when the transmembrane pressure (TMP) is excessively high, and the cleaning interval is 1−6 weeks for a typical MBR MF . 20,21 For a MBR NF , however, this short cleaning interval is generally unfavorable because (1) most commercial NF membranes are vulnerable to chlorine 22,23 use of MBR NF . In recent literature related to gravity-driven MBRs, researchers found that the fouling resistances remained at low levels over several months when operated at ultralow fluxes of <5 L•m −2 •h −1 (mostly in the range of 1−2 L•m −2 • h −1 ), 24−26 even without intensive physical cleaning.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%