2018
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy8090187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Flight Height on Droplet Distribution, Drift and Control of Cotton Aphids and Spider Mites

Abstract: Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), as emerging plant protection machinery, have the advantages of high operational efficiency, high speed, and low drift. The current study aimed to elucidate the characteristics of droplet distribution and drift, control efficiency on cotton aphids and spider mites, and attachment and absorption of cotton leaves during UAV spraying. Kromekote card and filter paper are used as samplers to collect droplets, and the droplet density, coverage rate, deposition, and drift percentage ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
66
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with ground equipment, the biggest difference is the volume of pesticide sprayed per unit area. The average application of ground application equipment (knapsack-type sprayer and boom sprayer) in dry crops (wheat and cotton) is 300-450 L per hectare, and 750 L/hectare was used by stretcher-mounted sprayer in rice, while the average application of drone is 15 L-30 L currently in China [12,14,15,17,18]. Spraying limited volumes while ensuring proper application coverage and pest control is a challenge for UAV applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with ground equipment, the biggest difference is the volume of pesticide sprayed per unit area. The average application of ground application equipment (knapsack-type sprayer and boom sprayer) in dry crops (wheat and cotton) is 300-450 L per hectare, and 750 L/hectare was used by stretcher-mounted sprayer in rice, while the average application of drone is 15 L-30 L currently in China [12,14,15,17,18]. Spraying limited volumes while ensuring proper application coverage and pest control is a challenge for UAV applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the many disadvantages involved with chemical use should be constrained as much as possible. Unmanned aircraft systems equipped for chemical spraying have been proven to eliminate many of these disadvantages such as terrain limitations of ground-based sprayers [61]; chemical exposure risks for farmers/workers [59]; and with proper use, UAS sprayers can be more effective and economical than traditional methods [59,60,62]. For example, Mink and his colleagues were able to save 90% of herbicide in maize fields and 43% of herbicide in sugar beet fields by using site-specific weed control methods via UAS [50].…”
Section: Chemical Sprayingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Mink and his colleagues were able to save 90% of herbicide in maize fields and 43% of herbicide in sugar beet fields by using site-specific weed control methods via UAS [50]. From the literature, it appears that Asia is leading the way in this area of research, with a great deal of research focus upon droplet distribution and drift [60][61][62][63][64]. According to Pederi and Cheporniuk, approximately half of all Japanese rice fields currently use UAS for spraying purposes [59].…”
Section: Chemical Sprayingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations