1988
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.38.7595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of uniaxial stress on the electron spin resonance in zinc-blende semiconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these two directions only, the B int in H 3 is perpendicular to the momentum and the electric field, hence satisfying a major constraint the experimental data poses on the theory. Since the value of the constant D is unknown from previous experimental studies (although it was suggested that they can be sometimes sizable [32]) there is no way of theoretically predicting the values of the spin-splitting from our model. However, we can check if the model is consistent with the experimental data and we can also obtain a value of the constant D which, being a material constant, should be similar on all the samples cited here.…”
Section: Fig 1: Direction Of the Internal Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these two directions only, the B int in H 3 is perpendicular to the momentum and the electric field, hence satisfying a major constraint the experimental data poses on the theory. Since the value of the constant D is unknown from previous experimental studies (although it was suggested that they can be sometimes sizable [32]) there is no way of theoretically predicting the values of the spin-splitting from our model. However, we can check if the model is consistent with the experimental data and we can also obtain a value of the constant D which, being a material constant, should be similar on all the samples cited here.…”
Section: Fig 1: Direction Of the Internal Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) with an SOI parameter R ] and the intrinsic bulk inversion asymmetry (Dresselhaus SOI [22] described by D ), respectively. In the present system, we consider three additional contributions described by SAW ) is induced by the off-diagonal (diagonal) components of strain tensor" [23][24][25]. Hence, and in Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ÁE c and ÁE v represent conduction and valence band offsets, respectively) [21], SAW S ¼ C 3 " XY =2, and SAW S ¼ Dð" XX À " ZZ Þ [23][24][25]. Here, the following material constants were used: r 6c6c 41 ¼ 5:206  10 À20 e m 2 [21], ðÁE c þ ÁE v Þ=ÁE c ¼ 1:636, C 3 ¼ 8:1  10 À10 eV m [17], and D ¼ 6:6  10 À12 eVm [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Strain breaks spatial inversion symmetry, which results in additional k-dependent spin splittings. [7][8][9] Strain-induced spin precession and characterization of k-linear spin splitting have been conducted in lattice-mismatched heterostructures 10 and using a mechanical vise. [11][12][13] Measurements on lattice-mismatched heterostructures observed both BIA-and SIA-type splitting but the splitting did not exhibit a clear trend as a function of measured strain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] Here x, y, and z denote the ͓100͔, ͓010͔, and ͓001͔ crystal axes, i denotes the ith Pauli matrix, ⑀ ij are the components of the strain tensor with ⑀ xy = ⑀ yx and ⑀ xx = ⑀ yy , and , ␣, D, and C 3 are material constants. H R and H 2 have the same direction dependence on momentum while H 1 has the same form as the linear Dresselhaus field for a two-dimensional system with quantum confinement along ͓001͔.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%