2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of uniaxial load on the sintering behaviour of 45S5 Bioglass® powder compacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The microcracks became enlarged and more numerous with further increase of 45S5 content to 15 wt % (Figure 3f). The emergence of microcracks might be due to the formation of a glassy continuous phase which led to a mismatch of the thermal expansion coefficient between β-TCP (13.1 × 10 −6 K −1 ) and 45S5 (14.6 × 10 −6 K −1 ) when the content was too high [34,35]. The microcracks were the reason for the decrease of mechanical properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microcracks became enlarged and more numerous with further increase of 45S5 content to 15 wt % (Figure 3f). The emergence of microcracks might be due to the formation of a glassy continuous phase which led to a mismatch of the thermal expansion coefficient between β-TCP (13.1 × 10 −6 K −1 ) and 45S5 (14.6 × 10 −6 K −1 ) when the content was too high [34,35]. The microcracks were the reason for the decrease of mechanical properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most useful methods to densify a porous film is hot pressing. Although hot pressing has been used for green body consolidation in powder metallurgy [24,25], it has not yet been applied to CIGS film densification. In this work, we initially applied normal loading on the screen-printed CIGS film during RTA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, ρ 0 , ρ C , and ρ G represent the individual relative densities of the debindered powder compacts, and the absolute densities of composite and as‐made glass, respectively. Simultaneous presentation of axial shrinkage and ρ allows, e.g., illustrative separation of the effect of external constraints and load‐induced viscous flow . For example, for ρ 0 = 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8, maximum shrinkage of 0.15, 0.11, and 0.07 can be expected from Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%