2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.10.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of uniaxial drawing on the structure and glass transition behavior of poly(trimethylene 2,6-naphthalate)/layered clay nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It leads a less constrained amorphous phase with higher cooperative rearranging regions (CRR) size in the model introduced by Adam and Gibbs [38] and adapted by Donth [39,40]. The decrease of CRR [41][42][43] size with the decrease of the amorphous phase content report in this study is analogous with previously published data on the evolution of the CRR in ceramic/ polymer nanocomposites [44,45]: the densification of the composite with the increase of the inorganic phase volume fraction tends to reduce the activation enthalpy of the α process and consequently the size of the CRR.…”
Section: α Relaxation Modesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It leads a less constrained amorphous phase with higher cooperative rearranging regions (CRR) size in the model introduced by Adam and Gibbs [38] and adapted by Donth [39,40]. The decrease of CRR [41][42][43] size with the decrease of the amorphous phase content report in this study is analogous with previously published data on the evolution of the CRR in ceramic/ polymer nanocomposites [44,45]: the densification of the composite with the increase of the inorganic phase volume fraction tends to reduce the activation enthalpy of the α process and consequently the size of the CRR.…”
Section: α Relaxation Modesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Except for the 97/3 nanocomposite with TEC as the plasticizer, the addition of organoclay changes the T g to higher values when compared with the plasticized CA (Table II). The shift of T g is strongly dependent on interface morphology, interparticle spacing, and polymer–nanoparticle interactions 44. On the other hand, complex relaxation dynamics in the polymer/layered clay nanocomposites relative to the nanoparticles can be expected due to the geometrical constraint imposed by the two‐dimensional space of the intercalated and exfoliated structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decrease of the CRR size upon the introduction of submicronic particles has been exhibited on the same samples, by thermostimulated currents [30]. Many authors have reports the influence of the fillers [31] content or crystallinity [32,33] of the samples on the CRR size. In both cases, an increase of non amorphous phase content (inorganic fillers or crystal phase) leads to a decrease of the CRR sizes associated with an increase of the heterogeneity in the amorphous phase of the polymer.…”
Section: Viscoelasticitymentioning
confidence: 89%