Effect of undigested neutral detergent fiber content of alfalfa hay on lactating dairy cows: Feeding behavior, fiber digestibility, and lactation performance

250

208

Many early studies laid the foundation for our understanding of the mechanics of chewing, the physiological role of chewing for the cow, and how chewing behavior is affected by dietary characteristics. However, the dairy cow has changed significantly over the past decades, as have the types of diets fed and the production systems used. The plethora of literature published in recent years provides new insights on eating and ruminating activity of dairy cows. Lactating dairy cows spend about 4.5 h/d eating (range: 2.4-8.5 h/d) and 7 h/d ruminating (range: 2.5-10.5 h/d), with a maximum total chewing time of 16 h/d. Chewing time is affected by many factors, most importantly whether access to feed is restricted, intake of neutral detergent fiber from forages, and mean particle size of the diet. Feed restriction and long particles (≥19 mm) have a greater effect on eating time, whereas intake of forage neutral detergent fiber and medium particles (4-19 mm) affects rumination time. It is well entrenched in the literature that promoting chewing increases salivary secretion of dairy cows, which helps reduce the risk of acidosis. However, the net effect of a change in chewing time on rumen buffing is likely rather small; therefore, acidosis prevention strategies need to be broad. Damage to plant tissues during mastication creates sites that provide access to fungi, adhesion of bacteria, and formation of biofilms that progressively degrade carbohydrates. Rumination and eating are the main ways in which feed is reduced in particle size. Contractions of the rumen increase during eating and ruminating activity and help move small particles to the escapable pool and into the omasum. Use of recently developed low-cost sensors that monitor chewing activity of dairy cows in commercial facilities can provide information that is helpful in management decisions, especially when combined with other criteria. Although accuracy and precision can be somewhat variable depending on sensor and conditions of use, relative changes in cow behavior, such as a marked decrease in rumination time of a cow or sustained low rumination time compared with a contemporary group of cows, can be used to help detect estrus, parturition, and some illnesses. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of the dietary, animal, and management factors that affect eating and ruminating behavior in dairy cows and presents an overview of the physiological importance of chewing with emphasis on recent developments and practical implications for feeding and managing the modern housed dairy cow.

Section: Chemical and Physical Characteristics Of The Dietmentioning

confidence: 99%

Invited review: Current perspectives on eating and rumination activity in dairy cows

Beauchemin

2018

250

208

“…Neutral detergent fiber: the measurement of ashfree aNDF organic matter (aNDFom) and ADF were as described by Fustini et al (2017), with ADF expressed inclusive of residual ash. Acid detergent lignin (sulfuric acid) was determined after ADF analysis by solubilization of cellulose with sulfuric acid.…”

Section: Chemical Composition Of Feedsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Susceptibility of dairy cows to subacute ruminal acidosis is reflected in milk fatty acid proportions, with C18:1 trans-10 as primary and C15:0 and C18:1 trans-11 as secondary indicators

Jing

Dewanckele

Vlaeminck

et al. 2018

The current study was carried out to assess 2 hypotheses: (1) cows differ in susceptibility to a subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) challenge, and (2) the milk fatty acid (FA) pattern can be used to differentiate susceptible from nonsusceptible cows. For this, 2 consecutive experiments were performed. During experiment 1, the milk FA pattern was determined on 125 cows fed an increasing amount of concentrate during the first 4 wk in milk (WIM). The coefficient of variation of several SARA indicative milk FA (i.e., C15:0, C18:1 trans-10, C18:2 cis-9,trans-11, and C18:1 trans-10 to C18:1 trans-11 ratio) increased, indicating that cows reacted differently upon the concentrate build-up. A first grouping was based on the milk fat C18:1 trans-10 proportion in the third WIM. Fifteen cows with the highest proportion of the latter FA (HT10) and their counterparts with low C18:1 trans-10 and equal parity distribution (LT10) were compared, which revealed that milk fat content and milk fat to protein ratio were lower for the HT10 group. From each of the HT10 and LT10 groups, 5 animals were selected for experiment 2. The subselection of the HT10 group, referred to as HT10s, showed a high proportion of C18:1 trans-10 at 3 WIM (>0.31 g/100 g of FA), a high level of C15:0 (on average ≥1.18 g/100 g of FA over the 4 WIM), and a sharp decrease of C18:1 trans-11 (Δ ≥ 0.25 g/100 g of FA during the 4 WIM). Their counterparts (LT10s) had a low milk fat C18:1 trans-10 proportion at 3 WIM (<0.23 g/100 g of FA), an average C15:0 proportion of 0.99 g/100 g of FA or lower, and a rather stable C18:1 trans-11 proportion. The HT10s group was hypothesized to be more susceptible to a SARA challenge, achieved by increasing amounts of rapidly fermentable carbohydrates in experiment 2. The HT10s cows had a lower nadir, mean, and maximum reticulo-ruminal pH; longer period of reticulo-ruminal pH below 6.0; and higher daily reticulo-ruminal pH variation compared with LT10s cows. Throughout experiment 2, HT10s and LT10s cows differed in levels of SARA indicative milk FA. Five animals, including one LT10s and 4 HT10s cows, experienced SARA, defined as reticulo-ruminal pH <6.0 for more than 360 min/d. These results indicate that it is possible to distinguish cows with different susceptibility to a SARA challenge within a herd by monitoring the milk FA composition when cows receive the same diet.

“…To produce this kind of cheese, feedstuffs, management, and milk processing must be in compliance with Parmigiano Reggiano regulations (Consorzio del Formaggio Parmigiano Reggiano, 2011) by virtue of the Ministerial Decree in force since October 1, 2011, that implement the European regulation for Protected Designation of Origin production (European Council, 2006). Cows must be fed without silages; therefore, to maintain milk production and composition and to avoid ruminal disorders, a proper inclusion of high-quality hays in the ration is needed (Fustini et al, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does the dry cow treatment with monensin controlled release capsule affect Parmigiano Reggiano cheese production?

Mammi

Grazia

Palmonari

et al. 2018

Self Cite

We investigated the effects of monensin controlled-release capsule (CRC; Kexxtone, Eli Lilly and Company Ltd., Indianapolis, IN) preventative ketosis treatment on the traditional cheesemaking process as well as the final characteristics of Parmigiano Reggiano (PR) cheese. The use of this prevention product to reduce the incidence of ketosis in transition dairy cows was approved by the European Medicines Agency in 2013. No previous studies are available concerning the effects of this treatment on prolonged-ripening cheese production such as PR. In PR cheese production, feed, feed additives, and cow treatments are strictly regulated to avoid any possible interference with traditional manufacturing processes. For these reasons, on 1 farm where all milk was used for PR cheese production, monensin CRC was administered to 33 cows, 21 d before calving in the monensin-treated group (TRT), whereas untreated cows with similar breed and parity characteristics constituted the control group (CTR). For 20 wk, milk obtained from each group and whey starter were separately managed and transported in the cheese factory, where 2 cheese wheels per group were produced daily, making 552 PR cheese wheels in total. Morning bulk tank milk composition, cheesemaking properties, and whey starter fermentation activities were analyzed twice a week. Every aspect of the cheesemaking process was recorded and the resulting cheese was evaluated after 36 h and 6, 12, and 18 mo from production for yield, texture defects, composition, and fatty acids profile. Milk from the 2 groups differed for somatic cell content (TRT = 3.04 vs. CTR = 4.06, somatic cell score), total bacterial count (TRT = 4.08 vs. CTR = 6.08 × 1,000 cfu/mL), titratable acidity (TRT = 3.66 vs. CTR = 3.72 Soxhlet-Henkel degrees/50 mL), and casein content percentage (TRT = 2.4 vs. CTR = 2.5%). Whey starter parameters were comparable between the 2 groups. Final cheese composition and organoleptic profile were not influenced by the treatment, except for C18:1 content being enhanced (TRT = 22.8 vs. CTR = 20.8% of fatty acids). Percentage of defected ripened cheese was significantly lower in the treated group, both at x-ray evaluation performed at 6 mo (TRT = 6.2 vs. CTR = 12.3%) and at the consortium inspection, performed at 12 mo of ripening (TRT = 1.5 vs. CTR = 6.5%). On the other hand, average cheese yield at 18 mo of ripening was partially reduced (TRT = 7.5 vs. CTR = 7.7%). Overall, the use of monensin CRC had no negative effect on the cheesemaking process, prolonged ripening cheese characteristics, milk composition, or whey starter quality.