2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ultrasound treatment on interactions of whey protein isolate with rutin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the MFGM, the fluorescence intensity of the MFGM-SL complex decreased, and the fluorescence emission peak was redshifted at maximum wavelength, indicating that sonication changed the secondary structure of the protein, resulting in the expansion of the protein structure. Previous study has reported that sonication could affect whey protein-rutin interactions, which resulted in redshift at maximum wavelengths, which was consistent with our results [22] . In addition, the fluorescence intensity of the sonicated MFGM-SL complex (150 W–600 W) was lower than that of the unsonicated MFGM-SL complex, which could be due to low ultrasonic power treatment leading to quenching of fluorescence of exposed tryptophan residues [23] .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Compared with the MFGM, the fluorescence intensity of the MFGM-SL complex decreased, and the fluorescence emission peak was redshifted at maximum wavelength, indicating that sonication changed the secondary structure of the protein, resulting in the expansion of the protein structure. Previous study has reported that sonication could affect whey protein-rutin interactions, which resulted in redshift at maximum wavelengths, which was consistent with our results [22] . In addition, the fluorescence intensity of the sonicated MFGM-SL complex (150 W–600 W) was lower than that of the unsonicated MFGM-SL complex, which could be due to low ultrasonic power treatment leading to quenching of fluorescence of exposed tryptophan residues [23] .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, protein-polyphenol covalent complexes can also be used as nanomaterials. Because proteins are of amphipathic nature, complexes of protein-polyphenol have binding affinity for both hydrophilic and hydrophobic substances ( 128–130 ). Therefore, the use of phenolic-protein adducts as new carriers for unstable bioactive substances (namely phenolic compounds, fatty acids, hormones, other lipophilic and drugs) has recently become a hot topic ( 131 , 132 ).…”
Section: Polyphenol-protein Covalent Complexes In Food Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%