2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ultrasound treatment on the water state in kiwifruit during osmotic dehydration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
92
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
92
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…2). For the apple tissue samples subjected to ultrasounds, the results of pre-treatment in the sucrose solution were similar to those obtained by Nowacka et al (2014) for kiwi fruit, wherein the initial use of ultrasounds induced a mass gain of 45%. Simal et al (1998) obtained a SG ranging from 23% (40°C) to 11% (70°C) for apples dehydrated in the sucrose solution (40, 50, 60 and 70°C), with ultrasound application (50 kHz).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…2). For the apple tissue samples subjected to ultrasounds, the results of pre-treatment in the sucrose solution were similar to those obtained by Nowacka et al (2014) for kiwi fruit, wherein the initial use of ultrasounds induced a mass gain of 45%. Simal et al (1998) obtained a SG ranging from 23% (40°C) to 11% (70°C) for apples dehydrated in the sucrose solution (40, 50, 60 and 70°C), with ultrasound application (50 kHz).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…4d, e), which are characterized by a more compact structure. Many sources of literature confirm the occurrence of changes in the structure of plant tissue as a result of water diffusion between plant tissue and the surrounding medium (Deng and Zhao 2008;Fernandes et al 2008a;Nowacka et al 2014). After subjecting apple tissue to 90 min of gentle shaking in distilled water, formation of a compact layer of cells on the surface of the apple cubes was observed (Fig.…”
Section: Microstructure Of Apple Parenchyma Tissuementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Both osmotic dehydration and ultrasound sonication of plant tissue before drying are considered effective forms of biomaterial pretreatment (Lenart 1996;Nowacka et al 2012), which can greatly reduce drying time, especially when applied together (Cárcel et al 2007;Fernandes and Rodrigues 2008). During tissue sonication, ultrasound affects the matrix structure by formation of microscopic channels that favor both mass transfer intensification during osmotic treatment, and higher water diffusivity during subsequent air-drying (Nowacka et al 2014). From a technological point of view, the ultrasound seemed to be very promising, but unfortunately, in some cases, especially when a liquid medium during sonication was applied, substantial losses of bioactive compounds were reported (Stojanovic and Silva 2007;Opalić et al 2009;Pingret et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies on the performance of osmotic dehydration for fruits like guava, kiwi, pineapple, rambutan, among others (Peiró-Mena et al, 2007;Lowithun et al, 2009;Vieira et al, 2012;Nowacka et al, 2014). This technique consists of immersing the raw material in a hypertonic solution for the partial removal of water, which takes place due to differences in osmotic pressure (Nowacka et al, 2014); however, since water removal is only partial, complementary conservation processes are required. Besides water, two other lower intensity flows are established in osmotic dehydration as the gain of solute from the solution to the fruit, and as the loss of natural soluble solids (pigments, acids, vitamins, and minerals) from the fruit to the solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%