2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ultrasound treatment conditions on Saccharomyces cerevisiae by response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As demonstrated, statistical programs have been invented for carrying out a large number of experiments in a shorter period of time and more efficiently to obtain optimum conditions, which can overcome these aforementioned defects rationally [21,22]. Response surface methodology (RSM), as a statistical method, is used to generate a model, analyze the effects of operating parameters and optimize the process conditions [23]. Furthermore, the central composited design (CCD) is a standard RSM design to analyze the relationship between the several variables and one or more response variables, which can also create a second-order response surface model in the optimization of processes [22,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As demonstrated, statistical programs have been invented for carrying out a large number of experiments in a shorter period of time and more efficiently to obtain optimum conditions, which can overcome these aforementioned defects rationally [21,22]. Response surface methodology (RSM), as a statistical method, is used to generate a model, analyze the effects of operating parameters and optimize the process conditions [23]. Furthermore, the central composited design (CCD) is a standard RSM design to analyze the relationship between the several variables and one or more response variables, which can also create a second-order response surface model in the optimization of processes [22,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now accept FAD audit certification [93]. However, tofacitinib for the treatment of moderate and severe Crohn' s disease in phase II clinical study [94] showed no obvious curative effect; 280 patients with moderately severe Crohn' s disease studied in the clinical trial were randomly assigned to 5 mg twice a day (n = 86), 10 mg twice a day (n = 86), 15 mg twice a day (n = 16), and placebo (n = 92, one are excluded), and accepted the specified treatment, respectively; a total of 236 patients completed the induction research, the primary end point for 8 weeks to relieve clinical (CDAI < 150). One hundred and eighty patients enrolled in the maintenance study, including 128 who completed the induction study, were randomized (placebo, n = 59; tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, n = 60; Tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily, n = 61) and received the prescribed treatment.…”
Section: Jak Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An overview of ultrasound effects on microbial safety is presented in Table 1. Liu et al [89] investigated the inactivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under varying conditions such as bacterial load concentration, pH, and treatment temperature and determined that ultrasound had the most significant role in the inactivation of the bacteria. Kang et al [90] examined the effects of ultrasound on the number of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and vegetative cells of Bacillus cereus in brining and beef during the curing processing.…”
Section: Microbial Food Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%