1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(78)85430-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ultrasound on a bilayer lipid membrane

Abstract: The effects of continuous wave ultrasound at a frequency of 1 MHz in the intensity range of 0-1.4 W/cm2 on an oxidized cholesterol bilayer lipid membrane (BLM) were observed. Ultrasound at 1.5 W/cm2 broke the membrane; in the range from 0.5 to 1.4 W/cm2, it accelerated the draining of the bulk lipid solution from the annulus to the Teflon support. At all intensities it has no effect on the conductance, the capacitance, or the dependence of each on the voltage applied across the membrane. Electrical parameters … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
9
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to earlier studies that found no effect of low-intensity ultrasound on the electrical properties of lipid bilayers [17], [18], our experiments clearly demonstrate dynamic and steady-state changes in bilayer capacitance in response to low-intensity ultrasound. The difference between the conclusions of these studies and ours may reflect differences in experimental design and bilayer properties.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to earlier studies that found no effect of low-intensity ultrasound on the electrical properties of lipid bilayers [17], [18], our experiments clearly demonstrate dynamic and steady-state changes in bilayer capacitance in response to low-intensity ultrasound. The difference between the conclusions of these studies and ours may reflect differences in experimental design and bilayer properties.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It would therefore not be surprising if they failed to detect transient capacitive currents in response to the onset and offset of ultrasound, and small steady-state changes in capacitance may not have been detectable with this method. In fact, Rohr et al [18] report a resolution of ±3% for their measurements of capacitance changes, which would have been insufficient to detect the small changes in capacitance that we observe (Pohl et al [16] do not report a resolution but it was probably similar). Bilayer composition may also play a role in the apparent lack of a response to ultrasound in these earlier studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A decreased input resistance by ultrasound stimulation indicated the presence of an increasing number of the opening ion channels induced by ultrasound stimulation, such as Na v conductance. Simultaneously, consistent with the previous studies, no significant change in the membrane capacitance was observed in the ultrasound‐stimulated group . Many sodium channels (i.e., Na v 1.2; 1.4; 1.5; 1.6) have been shown to possess mechanosensitive properties and modulate the trans‐membrane currents flowing; for example, Xenopus oocytes expressed Na v 1.5 channels by ultrasound stimulation .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This hypothesis has not, thus far, found robust experimental support. 50,51 A relatively recent model based on this idea, “intramembrane cavitation,” 29,47,48 predicts a profound drop of the membrane potential in response to FUS onset. The proposed drop measures ≥ 100 mV in the hyperpolarizing direction and can be observed for a period of several milliseconds.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Ultrasonic Neuromodulationmentioning
confidence: 99%