Effect of two isolated vocal facilitating techniques glottal fry and yawn-sigh on the phonation of female speech-language pathology students: A pilot study

Meerschman, Iris; D’haeseleer, Evelien; Catry, Tara; Ruigrok, Babin; Claeys, Sofie; Lierde, Kristiane Van

doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.03.004

Cited by 19 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, it can also be a marker of vocal resistance, effort or fatigue (Vogel et al, 2010;Pellicani et al, 2015;Onofre et al, 2017). Regardless of the reason, a rise in fo has been found after several vocal warm-up and training programs (Van Lierde et al, 2011;Meerschman et al, 2016aMeerschman et al, , 2016bMeerschman et al, , 2017. It has been considered as a result of muscle stretching and increased vocal fold tension, which is controlled by activation of the thyroarytenoid and cricothyroid muscles (Titze, 2000;De Bodt et al, 2008;Pellicani et al, 2015;Onofre et al, 2019).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Voice Quality of Choir Singers and the Effect of a Performance on the Voice

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Voice Quality of Choir Singers and the Effect of a Performance on the Voice

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Thus, its contribution is specific, and its information is nonredundant in comparison with other procedures commonly used in vocal clinical practice. In this context, this review identified the different acoustic measures that have been used in interventions in vocally healthy individuals, including fundamental frequency (f0) measures , intensity measures (18,22,23,25,(29)(30)(31)37,39,40,(43)(44)(45)(46)49,53,(56)(57)(58)61,63,66,67,(69)(70)(71)(72)(73) , cepstral/ spectral measures (25,(39)(40)(41)66,70,(73)(74)(75)(76)(77) , perturbation and noise measures (16,18,22,23,26,27,35,36,38-46,49-52,54-56,60-62,64,65,72,78-85) , acoustic indices (16,…”

Section: Effect Measures Most Used Before and After Voice Trainingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Single session (14, 20, 21, 24, 26-32, 35, 36 Information not available (22,23,25,33,39,54,55,58,59,75,77,90,110) ASSESSMENT METHOD Self-assessment (15-18, 22, 23, 28, 32, 33, 38, 45, (14-17, 19, 23, 24-27, 33, 34, 35, 37-39, 41-43, 45, 47, 49, 50, 51, 53-56, 60, 64, 66-68, 70-73, 76, 77, 78, 79, 82, 83, 85, 87-89, 91, 95, 97, 98, 100, 105, 106) MPT emission (vowel or alveolar fricatives) (18, 25, 28, 29, 33, 66-69, 75, 81, 91, 94, 100, 102, 105, 106, 108) Sustained vowel at varied intensities (20,21,33,43,45,46,51,67,87) Sustained vowel at varied frequencies (33,38,41,43,46,65,67,71,87,97,109) Linked speech at varied intensities (31,92,93,99,104) Linked speech at varied frequencies (17, 20, 28, 45, 46, 48, 53-56, 58, 59-61, 70, 73, 76, 78, 83, 84, 86, 88-94, 96, 99, 101, 104, 108) Singing tasks (17,20,48,…”

Section: Number Of Sessionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurements of the effect of interventions on heathly voices: a scope review

Moura,

Silva,

Santana

et al. 2023

Audiol., Commun. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose to map the vocal assessment measures used to verify the effect of the intervention in vocally healthy individuals. Research strategy This is a scope review based on the research question: What vocal assessment measures are used to verify the effect of the intervention in vocally healthy individuals? The search was carried out electronically in MEDLINE (PubMed), LILACS (BVS), Scopus (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate), Embase and Cochrane databases. Selection criteria The selection of studies was based on reading the titles, abstracts, keywords and full texts, applying the eligibility criteria. Data related to the publication’s bibliographic information, sample and intervention characteristics, the effects of the intervention on self-assessment, auditory-perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, electroglottographic measures, laryngeal examination results, among others, were extracted. The data were summarized and presented in a quantitative and descriptive way. Results 97 articles were selected, among the 979 studies mapped in this review. Acoustic analysis was the most used measure (n=70, 72.3%) to verify the effects of vocal training in the selected studies, followed by electroglottography (n= 55, 56.7%), self-assessment (n= 38, 39 .2%), aerodynamics (n= 33, 34.0%), auditory-perceptual judgment (n= 22, 22.7%) and laryngeal examination (n= 16, 16.5%). Conclusion Acoustic analysis is the measure used in most studies to verify the effect of the intervention in vocally healthy individuals.

show abstract

“…Dessa forma, a análise acústica traz uma contribuição específica e uma informação não redundante em comparação aos outros procedimentos comumente utilizados na clínica vocal. Nesse contexto, a presente revisão identificou que diferentes medidas acústicas têm sido utilizadas no cenário da intervenção com indivíduos vocalmente saudáveis, incluindo medidas baseadas na frequência fundamental , medidas de intensidade (18,22,23,25,(29)(30)(31)37,39,40,(43)(44)(45)(46)49,53,(56)(57)(58)61,63,66,67,(69)(70)(71)(72)(73) , medidas cepstrais/espectrais (25,(39)(40)(41)66,70,(73)(74)(75)(76)(77) , medidas de perturbação e ruído (16,18,22,23,26,27,35,36,…”

Section: Medidas De Efeito Mais Utilizadas Pré E Póstreinamento Vocalunclassified

Medidas de efeito das intervenções em vozes saudáveis: uma revisão de escopo

Moura,

Silva,

Santana

et al. 2023

Audiol., Commun. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO Objetivo mapear as medidas de avaliação vocal utilizadas para verificar o efeito da intervenção em indivíduos vocalmente saudáveis. Estratégia de pesquisa trata-se de uma revisão de escopo baseada na questão de pesquisa: “Quais as medidas de avaliação vocal utilizadas para verificar o efeito da intervenção em indivíduos vocalmente saudáveis?” A busca foi realizada de forma eletrônica nas bases de dados MEDLINE (PubMed), LILACS (BVS), Scopus (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate), Embase e Cochrane. Critérios de seleção a seleção dos estudos foi baseada na leitura dos títulos, resumos, palavras-chave e textos completos, aplicando-se os critérios de elegibilidade. Foram extraídos os dados relacionados às informações bibliográficas da publicação, características da amostra e da intervenção, os efeitos da intervenção nas medidas de autoavaliação, perceptivo-auditivas, acústicas, aerodinâmicas, eletroglotográficas, resultado do exame laríngeo, entre outros. Os dados foram resumidos e apresentados de forma quantitativa e descritiva. Resultados foram selecionados 97 artigos, entre os 979 estudos mapeados nesta revisão. A análise acústica foi a medida mais utilizada (n=70, 72,3%) para verificar os efeitos do treinamento vocal nos estudos selecionados, seguida pela eletroglotografia (n= 55, 56,7%), autoavaliação (n= 38, 39,2%), aerodinâmica (n= 33, 34,0%), julgamento perceptivo-auditivo (n= 22, 22,7%) e exame laríngeo (n= 16, 16,5%). Conclusão a análise acústica é a medida utilizada na maioria dos estudos para verificar o efeito da intervenção em indivíduos vocalmente saudáveis.

show abstract

Effect of two isolated vocal facilitating techniques glottal fry and yawn-sigh on the phonation of female speech-language pathology students: A pilot study

Cited by 19 publications

References 56 publications

Voice Quality of Choir Singers and the Effect of a Performance on the Voice

Voice Quality of Choir Singers and the Effect of a Performance on the Voice

Measurements of the effect of interventions on heathly voices: a scope review

Medidas de efeito das intervenções em vozes saudáveis: uma revisão de escopo

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About