2002
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2002001100003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of two dosages of Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum against Rhammatocerus schistocercoides Rehn

Abstract: -The fungus Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum, strain CG 423, was tested under field conditions against the gregarious grasshopper Rhammatocerus schistocercoides (Rehn) (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Conidia formulated in a racemic mixture of soybean oil and kerosene were sprayed under field conditions using an ultralow-volume hand-held atomizer Ulva Plus adjusted to deliver 2.9 L/ha. Bands composed of 2 nd instar nymphs were treated with either 5.0x10 12 or 1.0x10 13 viable conidia/ha. The number of insects in ea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Field trials with M. acridum for control of the grasshopper Rhammatocerus schistocercoides were carried out in Mato Grosso state with an oil-miscible flowable concentrate (conidia in soy oil diluted in kerosene oil before use, sprayed with ULV equipment). Control levels of nymphs were in the range of 65Á88% with doses equivalent to 0.5 (1)10 13 conidia ha (1 (Magalhães, Lecoq, Faria, Schmidt, and Guerra 2000;Faria et al 2002). Presently, due to extension of soybean and cotton monocultures in Mato Grosso, populations of this grass-feeding species have been at extremely low levels and control measures are not needed.…”
Section: Biocontrol Programsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Field trials with M. acridum for control of the grasshopper Rhammatocerus schistocercoides were carried out in Mato Grosso state with an oil-miscible flowable concentrate (conidia in soy oil diluted in kerosene oil before use, sprayed with ULV equipment). Control levels of nymphs were in the range of 65Á88% with doses equivalent to 0.5 (1)10 13 conidia ha (1 (Magalhães, Lecoq, Faria, Schmidt, and Guerra 2000;Faria et al 2002). Presently, due to extension of soybean and cotton monocultures in Mato Grosso, populations of this grass-feeding species have been at extremely low levels and control measures are not needed.…”
Section: Biocontrol Programsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For both dosages, total mortality rates of insects collected at 2 d postapplication, and kept in cages for 14 d under lab conditions, showed no significant differences as compared to that obtained with insects collected immediately after spraying (p ≥ 0.282). When healthy insects were fed native grasses sprayed at the field with 1.0 X 10 13 con./ha, mortality levels observed at 2 and 4 d postapplication were not affected when compared to day zero (p ≥ 0.050) (Faria et al 2001).…”
Section: Conidial Viability In Oil Formulation-a Simple Technique Tomentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Using petroleum products had been tested previously. de Faria et al (2002) showed that conidia of M. anisopliae var. acridum in a mixture of soybean oil and kerosene had a good effect on the locust, Rhammatocerus schistocercoides Rehn.…”
Section: Insecticidal Effect Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%