2009
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60871-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of two different house screening interventions on exposure to malaria vectors and on anaemia in children in The Gambia: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: SummaryBackground-House screening should protect people against malaria. We assessed whether two types of house screening, full screening of windows, doors and closing eaves or installing netting ceilings in local houses, could reduce malaria vector house entry and anaemia in children, in an area of seasonal transmission.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
303
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(323 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
12
303
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[61] Also, screening has no gender inequity concerns because protection does not target individuals. [65] The possibility of using expired ITNs [64] and locally affordable and accessible materials like mud, palms and sticks, [60,63] makes screening highly financially feasible and highly sustainable. [64] c) Include malaria prevention in school curricula.…”
Section: Strategies To Address Community Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[61] Also, screening has no gender inequity concerns because protection does not target individuals. [65] The possibility of using expired ITNs [64] and locally affordable and accessible materials like mud, palms and sticks, [60,63] makes screening highly financially feasible and highly sustainable. [64] c) Include malaria prevention in school curricula.…”
Section: Strategies To Address Community Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where men are often absent from home due to work opportunities in distant centres and mothers (or others) then act as caregivers of families, even less time and resources would be available to service the required actions inherent in community-based control programmes. Given the current success of IRS and associated support systems in malaria prevention in Limpopo 13 and elsewhere, unless other community-passive and successful methods for the prevention of malaria transmission can be developed (such as house screening or house design modifications) 25,26 that is as good or better than IRS, it seems unreasonable to expect poor communities to adopt a far more community-active system while they are still battling with poverty and other overriding day-to-day issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 In a recent large-scale randomized controlled trial, house screening with untreated fly-screen mesh, installed as ceilings or as full screening on the doors and windows, reduced anaemia due to malaria in young Gambian children by around 50 %. 22 Since anaemia due to malaria is a major killer of young children, house screening has the potential to substantially reduce malaria deaths in this age group. In urban Africa, malaria transmission is about 95 % lower than in rural areas 23 , with few vectors entering houses.…”
Section: Promoting Health and Advancing Development Through Improvedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 The cost of full house screening is around $10 per person (assuming four people per house) and would be similar to insecticide-treated bednets or indoor residual spraying if it remained effective for 3-4 years. 22 In the case of water and sanitation technologies, costs are relatively low (Table 3) but still beyond the reach of the poorest. An important question for future analysis is the potential of greater economic efficiency for integrated interventions and delivery.…”
Section: Box 4 Incremental and Modular Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%